The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Anyone else sick of hearing that? I hate it when my parents or my grandparents say "this was good but the original was better" because they are wrong every time.
I will agree with them that the originals of movies may have been good for there time but Im not goin any further to say that they are better than what we have now.
The Titanic was a great film. The old and new one, but its rubbish to say that the original was better than the remake. I will admit that without the original the remake may have been a little worse than it is now but still it doesnt justify the fact that the original sucks in comparison to the new and improved.
The count of Monte cristo was a great film but its story wasnt as good as the original. Even with this setback it made up for it with a great cast and action scenes.
Spiderman, the series and the original movie, sucked beyond belief until the movie came out to reclaim the faim. But still people say that the original was great in comparison to the new series of spiderman movies. Have they seen the new ones?
I beg all those that are out there to just stop saying the originals are better and that wev run out of ideas for more movies because its just not true. We keep gettin new movies and reinventing old ones to make them better. So just sit back put on the originals if you want and wait for the new Superman movie to come out
FCB
I will agree with them that the originals of movies may have been good for there time but Im not goin any further to say that they are better than what we have now.
The Titanic was a great film. The old and new one, but its rubbish to say that the original was better than the remake. I will admit that without the original the remake may have been a little worse than it is now but still it doesnt justify the fact that the original sucks in comparison to the new and improved.
The count of Monte cristo was a great film but its story wasnt as good as the original. Even with this setback it made up for it with a great cast and action scenes.
Spiderman, the series and the original movie, sucked beyond belief until the movie came out to reclaim the faim. But still people say that the original was great in comparison to the new series of spiderman movies. Have they seen the new ones?
I beg all those that are out there to just stop saying the originals are better and that wev run out of ideas for more movies because its just not true. We keep gettin new movies and reinventing old ones to make them better. So just sit back put on the originals if you want and wait for the new Superman movie to come out
FCB
Page:
> Chr1s wrote:
> It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I
> find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg
> in
> it.
>
Very_Metal wrote:
> i thought "perfect storm" was quality.
> but as ever, i spent most of the time trying to suss how they got
> such nice CG water.
I gotta say i enjoyed that film...saw it in the cinema in York and its pretty good with their surround sound too.
Does anyone else sometimes confuse Matt Damon with Mark Wahlberg?
> It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I
> find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg
> in
> it.
>
Very_Metal wrote:
> i thought "perfect storm" was quality.
> but as ever, i spent most of the time trying to suss how they got
> such nice CG water.
I gotta say i enjoyed that film...saw it in the cinema in York and its pretty good with their surround sound too.
Does anyone else sometimes confuse Matt Damon with Mark Wahlberg?
Chr1s wrote:
> It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I
> find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg in
> it.
i thought "perfect storm" was quality.
but as ever, i spent most of the time trying to suss how they got such nice CG water.
> It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I
> find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg in
> it.
i thought "perfect storm" was quality.
but as ever, i spent most of the time trying to suss how they got such nice CG water.
They called it the Italian Job so they can skip out all the marketing, and let people's memories do the job. Lazy ass mo-fos.
The Wardy wrote:
> With the Italian Job i feel that the new one is a very good film and i
> enjoyed watching it. I dont see why they called it that because it
> was nothing like the old one except the minis.
It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg in it.
> With the Italian Job i feel that the new one is a very good film and i
> enjoyed watching it. I dont see why they called it that because it
> was nothing like the old one except the minis.
It's not as bad as some make it out to be, but it's far from good. I find it hard to enjoy anything that has monkey-faced Mark Wahlberg in it.
The Wardy wrote:
> With the Italian Job i feel that the new one is a very good film
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> The Italian Job remake was a good film, if aids is a fun hobby.
I agree with Tilt.
> With the Italian Job i feel that the new one is a very good film
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> The Italian Job remake was a good film, if aids is a fun hobby.
I agree with Tilt.
The Italian Job remake was a good film, if aids is a fun hobby.
FatCollegeBear wrote:
> Ok I give. In my opinion *thinks he should of used that word befor*
> the remakes are better than the originals.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Godzilla
> The Haunting
> The Longest Yard
> Rollerball
> Stepford Wives
> Texas Chainsaw Massacre
> The Vanishing
> Planet of the apes
> Get Cater
> Assault on Precinct 13
> Invasion of the Body Snatchers
> Alfie
And the aforementioned Pyscho.
Then you sir, are a dum-dum with no idea of what makes a good movie. Who's to say a matrix remake in the future wont be better than the original?
Why the hell is "D___ A__" banned?
[edit] I've just found out that Invasion of the body snatchers is being remade again as "Invasion", this time as the long overdue Aids metaphor.
> Ok I give. In my opinion *thinks he should of used that word befor*
> the remakes are better than the originals.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Godzilla
> The Haunting
> The Longest Yard
> Rollerball
> Stepford Wives
> Texas Chainsaw Massacre
> The Vanishing
> Planet of the apes
> Get Cater
> Assault on Precinct 13
> Invasion of the Body Snatchers
> Alfie
And the aforementioned Pyscho.
Then you sir, are a dum-dum with no idea of what makes a good movie. Who's to say a matrix remake in the future wont be better than the original?
Why the hell is "D___ A__" banned?
[edit] I've just found out that Invasion of the body snatchers is being remade again as "Invasion", this time as the long overdue Aids metaphor.
With the Italian Job i feel that the new one is a very good film and i enjoyed watching it. I dont see why they called it that because it was nothing like the old one except the minis.
I hear they are bringing another one out soon.
Just going to check IMDB
EDIT: Yep, its called the Brazillian Job
[URL]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427396/[/URL]
I hear they are bringing another one out soon.
Just going to check IMDB
EDIT: Yep, its called the Brazillian Job
[URL]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427396/[/URL]
Ok I give. In my opinion *thinks he should of used that word befor* the remakes are better than the originals.
You guys can all think what you want. And I dont think anyone should remake the matrix as it cant be improved anyway its perfect
You guys can all think what you want. And I dont think anyone should remake the matrix as it cant be improved anyway its perfect
But Assault on precinct 13 had Ja Rule in it.
Ja Rule!
[S][S][S][S][S]getting shot! That's why it's good. Shot in the head[/S][/S][/S]
Ja Rule!
[S][S][S][S][S]getting shot! That's why it's good. Shot in the head[/S][/S][/S]
Page: