The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
which of the next genaration consals do u think will end up the best?
Page:
In my short time here I have begun to learn that posts like this are not very popular so if you want to be accepted here I suggest you dont make one like this again. Just a warning not a threat...............
I personnaly think that all the rich people with PS2 will end up geting the gamecube. Some normal people will get the X-Box but most will not be able to aford it.
Legendary Link wrote:
> It is possible that MGS2 could come out on the GC considering the
> first MGS game was on the NES and that Konami develop games for
> Nintendo.
It may be possible, I just think think that it is unlikely. I mean take the Xbox, for example. It is getting a MGS game that is based on both the PSX version of MGS and the PS2's MGS2.
> It is possible that MGS2 could come out on the GC considering the
> first MGS game was on the NES and that Konami develop games for
> Nintendo.
It may be possible, I just think think that it is unlikely. I mean take the Xbox, for example. It is getting a MGS game that is based on both the PSX version of MGS and the PS2's MGS2.
It is possible that MGS2 could come out on the GC considering the first MGS game was on the NES and that Konami develop games for Nintendo.
Nintendo have already sent out Gamecube game developing software to Squaresoft so we should see a FF.Also Squaresoft are already making an exclusive FF game for the GBA.
Dan uk wrote:
> Actually, part of the reason Nintendo is bitter towards Squaresoft
> is because Square never released a FF game on the N64.
Why didn't
> they?
Well a game that only just fits on 3 or 4 disks would never
> fit on 10 cartriges, let alone one. That's why squaresoft never even
> tried.
Now Nintendo is acting like a big baby instead of looking
> to the future!
Ah, but Capcom managed to fit the whole of Resident evil 2 on to one cartridge and that took up two disks on PSX.
Anyway, I was referring to an exclusive Final Fantasy game on N64, one that would easily fit on to a cartridge.
But, now that Nintendo are bringing out Gamecube, it would be a good idea for Nintendo to buck up their ideas and get Squaresoft to produce games for them.
> Actually, part of the reason Nintendo is bitter towards Squaresoft
> is because Square never released a FF game on the N64.
Why didn't
> they?
Well a game that only just fits on 3 or 4 disks would never
> fit on 10 cartriges, let alone one. That's why squaresoft never even
> tried.
Now Nintendo is acting like a big baby instead of looking
> to the future!
Ah, but Capcom managed to fit the whole of Resident evil 2 on to one cartridge and that took up two disks on PSX.
Anyway, I was referring to an exclusive Final Fantasy game on N64, one that would easily fit on to a cartridge.
But, now that Nintendo are bringing out Gamecube, it would be a good idea for Nintendo to buck up their ideas and get Squaresoft to produce games for them.
Actually, part of the reason Nintendo is bitter towards Squaresoft is because Square never released a FF game on the N64.
Why didn't they?
Well a game that only just fits on 3 or 4 disks would never fit on 10 cartriges, let alone one. That's why squaresoft never even tried.
Now Nintendo is acting like a big baby instead of looking to the future!
Why didn't they?
Well a game that only just fits on 3 or 4 disks would never fit on 10 cartriges, let alone one. That's why squaresoft never even tried.
Now Nintendo is acting like a big baby instead of looking to the future!
Dan uk wrote:
> I reckon that sooner or later, MGS 2 will make it's way to the
> Gamecube.
It would be so easy to convert and basically easy money
> for Konami. They might even find time to put extras in.
As for a
> sequel to Goldeneye. It WAS Perfect Dark. I know one or 2 of the
> team went off to make Timesplitters on the PS2 (who knows, they
> might even convert that to the Gamecube too) but the rest of the
> team came up with Perfect Dark which was a great game even if it did
> suffer from slowdown in places and not make Goldeneye's
> impact.
The way I see it, most PS2 games can be converted quite
> easily to the Gamecube and Xbox, hopefully with better graphics and
> features.
So if the Gamecube is going to end up with the bulk of
> good PS2 and Xbox games and have plenty of exclusive blockbusters
> from Rare and Nintendo then it SHOULD come out on top.
I
> only wish Nintendo would grow up and ask Squaresoft to make games
> for them.
Nintendo: You've made games with Sony. We don't want
> you.
Squaresoft: Fine then, we never wanted to release Final
> Fantasy games on your childrens toy anyway!
Nintendo:
> Fine!
They both part. Once they're out of each others earshot
> they both start crying
Nintendo: I want Final Fantasy games ,
> sniff
Squaresoft: sob, I wanted to make money on the
> Gamecube.
And all because of this petty arguing, us Nintendo
> gamers might never see a Final Fantasy game on the Gamecube.
It's
> just typical...
I very much doubt that the actual PS2 version of MGS2 will be released on the Gamecube. The Gamecube would more likely get it's own version.
And on the subject of 'Nintendo growing up', I completly agree. Just think how the N64 could have benefited from a Final Fantasy game.
> I reckon that sooner or later, MGS 2 will make it's way to the
> Gamecube.
It would be so easy to convert and basically easy money
> for Konami. They might even find time to put extras in.
As for a
> sequel to Goldeneye. It WAS Perfect Dark. I know one or 2 of the
> team went off to make Timesplitters on the PS2 (who knows, they
> might even convert that to the Gamecube too) but the rest of the
> team came up with Perfect Dark which was a great game even if it did
> suffer from slowdown in places and not make Goldeneye's
> impact.
The way I see it, most PS2 games can be converted quite
> easily to the Gamecube and Xbox, hopefully with better graphics and
> features.
So if the Gamecube is going to end up with the bulk of
> good PS2 and Xbox games and have plenty of exclusive blockbusters
> from Rare and Nintendo then it SHOULD come out on top.
I
> only wish Nintendo would grow up and ask Squaresoft to make games
> for them.
Nintendo: You've made games with Sony. We don't want
> you.
Squaresoft: Fine then, we never wanted to release Final
> Fantasy games on your childrens toy anyway!
Nintendo:
> Fine!
They both part. Once they're out of each others earshot
> they both start crying
Nintendo: I want Final Fantasy games ,
> sniff
Squaresoft: sob, I wanted to make money on the
> Gamecube.
And all because of this petty arguing, us Nintendo
> gamers might never see a Final Fantasy game on the Gamecube.
It's
> just typical...
I very much doubt that the actual PS2 version of MGS2 will be released on the Gamecube. The Gamecube would more likely get it's own version.
And on the subject of 'Nintendo growing up', I completly agree. Just think how the N64 could have benefited from a Final Fantasy game.
I reckon that sooner or later, MGS 2 will make it's way to the Gamecube.
It would be so easy to convert and basically easy money for Konami. They might even find time to put extras in.
As for a sequel to Goldeneye. It WAS Perfect Dark. I know one or 2 of the team went off to make Timesplitters on the PS2 (who knows, they might even convert that to the Gamecube too) but the rest of the team came up with Perfect Dark which was a great game even if it did suffer from slowdown in places and not make Goldeneye's impact.
The way I see it, most PS2 games can be converted quite easily to the Gamecube and Xbox, hopefully with better graphics and features.
So if the Gamecube is going to end up with the bulk of good PS2 and Xbox games and have plenty of exclusive blockbusters from Rare and Nintendo then it SHOULD come out on top.
I only wish Nintendo would grow up and ask Squaresoft to make games for them.
Nintendo: You've made games with Sony. We don't want you.
Squaresoft: Fine then, we never wanted to release Final Fantasy games on your childrens toy anyway!
Nintendo: Fine!
They both part. Once they're out of each others earshot they both start crying
Nintendo: I want Final Fantasy games , sniff
Squaresoft: sob, I wanted to make money on the Gamecube.
And all because of this petty arguing, us Nintendo gamers might never see a Final Fantasy game on the Gamecube.
It's just typical...
It would be so easy to convert and basically easy money for Konami. They might even find time to put extras in.
As for a sequel to Goldeneye. It WAS Perfect Dark. I know one or 2 of the team went off to make Timesplitters on the PS2 (who knows, they might even convert that to the Gamecube too) but the rest of the team came up with Perfect Dark which was a great game even if it did suffer from slowdown in places and not make Goldeneye's impact.
The way I see it, most PS2 games can be converted quite easily to the Gamecube and Xbox, hopefully with better graphics and features.
So if the Gamecube is going to end up with the bulk of good PS2 and Xbox games and have plenty of exclusive blockbusters from Rare and Nintendo then it SHOULD come out on top.
I only wish Nintendo would grow up and ask Squaresoft to make games for them.
Nintendo: You've made games with Sony. We don't want you.
Squaresoft: Fine then, we never wanted to release Final Fantasy games on your childrens toy anyway!
Nintendo: Fine!
They both part. Once they're out of each others earshot they both start crying
Nintendo: I want Final Fantasy games , sniff
Squaresoft: sob, I wanted to make money on the Gamecube.
And all because of this petty arguing, us Nintendo gamers might never see a Final Fantasy game on the Gamecube.
It's just typical...
Page: