The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What?
Grix is getting married?
Grix is getting married?
Page:
:^D
Game wrote:
>
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
Oh no, now God had AIDS?
>
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
Oh no, now God had AIDS?
Game wrote:
> down wrote:
> Why didn't God want to heal him though?
>
> too unsubtle?
>
> (of Parkinson's I mean)
>
> I'm sure God would have liked to have healed him. But the pope's time
> was up anyway. He's now in heaven/paradise and being there is far
> better than being here.
>
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
...
...
It's not like he first had the symptoms less than an hour before his death, you know, he struggled with it for years
> down wrote:
> Why didn't God want to heal him though?
>
> too unsubtle?
>
> (of Parkinson's I mean)
>
> I'm sure God would have liked to have healed him. But the pope's time
> was up anyway. He's now in heaven/paradise and being there is far
> better than being here.
>
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
...
...
It's not like he first had the symptoms less than an hour before his death, you know, he struggled with it for years
Dead Spiders wrote:
> Of course, with their *rules* on not using condoms, he was probably
> the no.1 cause of Aids in *everyone* in 2003.
:-)
> Of course, with their *rules* on not using condoms, he was probably
> the no.1 cause of Aids in *everyone* in 2003.
:-)
Game wrote:
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
So he was unwilling?
:^D
> God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die
> soon and be with him.
So he was unwilling?
:^D
Game wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
>
> He was the no: #1 cause of AIDS in Catholic boys under 10 in 2003
>
> The problem with making things like that up, is that it dismissed
> them as factual. So, in other words, you're talking complete
> b****cks....
Did he give you AIDS buddy?
> Paradox: wrote:
>
> He was the no: #1 cause of AIDS in Catholic boys under 10 in 2003
>
> The problem with making things like that up, is that it dismissed
> them as factual. So, in other words, you're talking complete
> b****cks....
Did he give you AIDS buddy?
FORGIVE ME GAME
I am not rich in my Christian beliefs as you are.
I am not rich in my Christian beliefs as you are.
down wrote:
> Why didn't God want to heal him though?
>
> too unsubtle?
>
> (of Parkinson's I mean)
I'm sure God would have liked to have healed him. But the pope's time was up anyway. He's now in heaven/paradise and being there is far better than being here.
God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die soon and be with him.
> Why didn't God want to heal him though?
>
> too unsubtle?
>
> (of Parkinson's I mean)
I'm sure God would have liked to have healed him. But the pope's time was up anyway. He's now in heaven/paradise and being there is far better than being here.
God didn't heal the pope because there was no point. He would die soon and be with him.
Of course, with their *rules* on not using condoms, he was probably the no.1 cause of Aids in *everyone* in 2003.
Paradox: wrote:
> He was the no: #1 cause of AIDS in Catholic boys under 10 in 2003
The problem with making things like that up, is that it dismissed them as factual. So, in other words, you're talking complete b****cks....
> He was the no: #1 cause of AIDS in Catholic boys under 10 in 2003
The problem with making things like that up, is that it dismissed them as factual. So, in other words, you're talking complete b****cks....
Page: