Viewing Thread:
"A good move for City?"

I think so.

[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/4621425.stm[/URL]

No doubt he's their best player, but one player doesn't make a good team. With that kind of cash they can build a better squad, so I think it's a good move for them.

For England however...

I do actually rate Carton Cole. Not a bad player.

They should have, yuss.

If they had any sense, City would have asked for £21 million + Carlton Cole on loan....

Andy Cole isn't it?

With which he'll spend about £8 million on some european player no-one has ever heard of and who's guarenteed to flop in the premiership.

It's a Man City tradition to waste money.

Reynolds wrote:
> Well considering City are £60million in debt it remains to be
> seen how much of it Pearce will see...

Pearce is guarenteed about £10m.

Clazon wrote:
> Kawada wrote:
> i bet you're cheering for that beautiful United player
>
> Let's not go to far now.
>
> :D


Yea i'm sorry, he's nowhere near in the league of Gorgeous Neville :-D

Kawada wrote:
> i bet you're cheering for that beautiful United player

Let's not go too far now.

:D

But yeah. I'm gutted he's gone to them.

*sigh*

Well considering City are £60million in debt it remains to be seen how much of it Pearce will see...

Mozzy wrote:
> Chelsea wont benefit much from this transfer, they already have Joe
> Cole. Why spend £21 million on a player you dont really need?

I think the champs league games with Liverpool showed they need more options on the wing.