The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Max mosely has gone back on his decision to make F1 low tech by 08. Meaning: more stupid rules (such as the engine penalty drop), more uninspiring racing (like silverstone last week) and most importantly, many more races where the jordans and minardis are there to fill up the grid.
Not to mention, to provide an obstruction in the tunnel at monaco
I believe cutting edge technology is a key part of F1. It just shouldn't detract from the competitiveness and the driver skill element of the sport.
He still wants to keep the cost down but introduce new technology, like this: [URL]http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=33473[/URL]
He's also suggesting standard ECU's, and fromm 2008 teams will be able to sell entire chassis and/or engines to other teams, which should enable more privateer teams to exist in the sport.
If the rogue teams don't breakaway, I can see F1 becoming even more interesting post 2008.
Max mosely has gone back on his decision to make F1 low tech by 08. Meaning: more stupid rules (such as the engine penalty drop), more uninspiring racing (like silverstone last week) and most importantly, many more races where the jordans and minardis are there to fill up the grid.
Not to mention, to provide an obstruction in the tunnel at monaco