The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp?pagetypeid=2&articleid=36447&subsectionid=1584[/URL]
I think the screenshot is real...but the info isn't.
What do you think?
I think the screenshot is real...but the info isn't.
What do you think?
Page:
Oh dear. Seems they didn't learn a single thing from San Andreas.
6 times bigger = bad.
Running out of petrol = bad bad bad.
Awful in fact, possibly the worst idea I've ever heard of.
They know it's a game, right - as in, supposed to be fun?
6 times bigger = bad.
Running out of petrol = bad bad bad.
Awful in fact, possibly the worst idea I've ever heard of.
They know it's a game, right - as in, supposed to be fun?
Looks average for a next-gen offering.
Might be acceptable if it's a launch title on 360.
Might be acceptable if it's a launch title on 360.
I suggest you do so you don't look like a complete 'tard next time.
No, I haven't.
Oh dear Stridman. Oh dear. Ever heard of a little something called blu-ray? Ever even taken a look at the Ps3's specs?
Remember though, if the next game is 6 times bigger than GTA San Andreas the graphics wont be amazing.
San Andreas doesn't look anywhere near as good as that. The lighting and the textures are tons better than San Andreas on any of the systems.
It looks awful.
GTA SA looks better than that (for PC mind).
GTA SA looks better than that (for PC mind).
That shot could be from anything...
To be honest, I don't think any of it is real. I really can't see Rockstar letting a screenshot slip through the net and the info sounds a bit made up to me.
Page: