The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Living in the fantasy failure of Nintendo's world it is easy to be misled.
Lack of games has meant both the Gamecube and the X-box has failed to even dent the monster of the Playstation. Pull out fantastic games all you want, there just isn't enough to please all those billions of games players.
Nintendo promise revolution, Microsoft promise variety... Sony promise to damage the profits of both its rivals even further. One of them is almost certainly correct.
There is always a get out clause for Nintendo, being such a massive games developer themselves they CAN always become a simply 2nd or 3rd party developer. Unless Microsoft can increase the amount of games they have on their system, they have no such get out clause.
Both Microsoft and Nintendo are struggling. Yep Nintendo have a lot of money and so do Microsoft. But neither wish to support a massive loss. We've discussed a combined effort of Microsoft and Nintendo which would increase game out put, fan basses and variety of system capabilties.
It won't happen.
Microsoft will continue to pump money into their dead weight and Nintendo will try and invent another "innovative" idea.
When "revolution" was announced we all looked at the Bongo's, at the DS and at the (shudder) Microphone. Nintendo will add some imagintive new way to play games and hope it'll take off. Nintendo said the DS is a clue to the future of Revolution. What two screens? a microphone built in? Touch screen? What exactly Nintendo, unless all are implemented I cannot see this "revolutionising" gaming... just confusing it.
How about GBA 2? Or GameBoy Evolution. A simple gaming device, plenty of buttons, a nice well made screen, 2 analogue sticks for the ultimate gaming on the go. With revolution graphics.
Certainly that will be possible soon. Handheld gaming just looks better and better and you know it. There is no longer any restrictions.
Especially by 2006.
The revolution of gaming could feature a nice new controller, that in fact could also be a GBE. I don't mean a GBE CAN be used. Rather a GBE has the same buttons as a Revolution Controller.
Is it not time Nintendo really revolutionised gaming with a "GOOD" idea.
Connectivity is the damn future of gaming and you know it. What Nintendo "could" do is endless. 2 versions of the game, one for the GBE and one for the Gamecube. Maybe sold together. Play one, save it to the GBE and continue the GBE version on the go.
Or how about play the game on Revolution and download the game from the disc onto the GBE's format. GBE's games are avalible via download through Revolution.
Maybe I'm going too far here. Downloading the game you are playing to play "on the go" seems daft. Why not simply plug a GBE into the tele and play it straight?
Well Revolution will be this DVD/Music/Internet hybrid. The GBE's late 2006 launch will halt the PSP's advance. And Nintendo will be looking at a system to die for.
Imagine, playing a football game on Revolution. Download the save file on the "memory card" which is specific for the game and is used as the source for the GBE. The game is already on the card but the saved data from the Revolution title can be transferred to it. Then take a bus and continue the game you were playing.
This would sell. It is essentially buy one game and play it wherever you want, on two different systems. Multiplayer avalible via one and single player the other. It would work.
But is the technology ready? Can Nintendo really produce a machine that runs revolution graphics, plays revolution sized games that is easily downloadable onto a memory card? And doesn't eat battery life to death? Well if Nintendo can make a handheld that has 2 processors and 2 screens and still have a good battery life then I don't doubt it for a second. There is no need for a laser, I'm not talking CD's... I don't want some MP3 player hybrid...
And IPODS are lasting longer and longer as batteries become better and better.
Christmas 2006 for the Revolution and the Evolution could be the idea time for a real gaming "revolution". Whether it'll take off or not is a different matter entirely.
Lack of games has meant both the Gamecube and the X-box has failed to even dent the monster of the Playstation. Pull out fantastic games all you want, there just isn't enough to please all those billions of games players.
Nintendo promise revolution, Microsoft promise variety... Sony promise to damage the profits of both its rivals even further. One of them is almost certainly correct.
There is always a get out clause for Nintendo, being such a massive games developer themselves they CAN always become a simply 2nd or 3rd party developer. Unless Microsoft can increase the amount of games they have on their system, they have no such get out clause.
Both Microsoft and Nintendo are struggling. Yep Nintendo have a lot of money and so do Microsoft. But neither wish to support a massive loss. We've discussed a combined effort of Microsoft and Nintendo which would increase game out put, fan basses and variety of system capabilties.
It won't happen.
Microsoft will continue to pump money into their dead weight and Nintendo will try and invent another "innovative" idea.
When "revolution" was announced we all looked at the Bongo's, at the DS and at the (shudder) Microphone. Nintendo will add some imagintive new way to play games and hope it'll take off. Nintendo said the DS is a clue to the future of Revolution. What two screens? a microphone built in? Touch screen? What exactly Nintendo, unless all are implemented I cannot see this "revolutionising" gaming... just confusing it.
How about GBA 2? Or GameBoy Evolution. A simple gaming device, plenty of buttons, a nice well made screen, 2 analogue sticks for the ultimate gaming on the go. With revolution graphics.
Certainly that will be possible soon. Handheld gaming just looks better and better and you know it. There is no longer any restrictions.
Especially by 2006.
The revolution of gaming could feature a nice new controller, that in fact could also be a GBE. I don't mean a GBE CAN be used. Rather a GBE has the same buttons as a Revolution Controller.
Is it not time Nintendo really revolutionised gaming with a "GOOD" idea.
Connectivity is the damn future of gaming and you know it. What Nintendo "could" do is endless. 2 versions of the game, one for the GBE and one for the Gamecube. Maybe sold together. Play one, save it to the GBE and continue the GBE version on the go.
Or how about play the game on Revolution and download the game from the disc onto the GBE's format. GBE's games are avalible via download through Revolution.
Maybe I'm going too far here. Downloading the game you are playing to play "on the go" seems daft. Why not simply plug a GBE into the tele and play it straight?
Well Revolution will be this DVD/Music/Internet hybrid. The GBE's late 2006 launch will halt the PSP's advance. And Nintendo will be looking at a system to die for.
Imagine, playing a football game on Revolution. Download the save file on the "memory card" which is specific for the game and is used as the source for the GBE. The game is already on the card but the saved data from the Revolution title can be transferred to it. Then take a bus and continue the game you were playing.
This would sell. It is essentially buy one game and play it wherever you want, on two different systems. Multiplayer avalible via one and single player the other. It would work.
But is the technology ready? Can Nintendo really produce a machine that runs revolution graphics, plays revolution sized games that is easily downloadable onto a memory card? And doesn't eat battery life to death? Well if Nintendo can make a handheld that has 2 processors and 2 screens and still have a good battery life then I don't doubt it for a second. There is no need for a laser, I'm not talking CD's... I don't want some MP3 player hybrid...
And IPODS are lasting longer and longer as batteries become better and better.
Christmas 2006 for the Revolution and the Evolution could be the idea time for a real gaming "revolution". Whether it'll take off or not is a different matter entirely.
Page:
Dringo wrote:
> I AM HARDCORE B*TCH!
Other people seem to find it amusing, at least...
> I AM HARDCORE B*TCH!
Other people seem to find it amusing, at least...
Apple Crumble wrote:
> Merm, what exaclty have I said?
Bloody hell, you kicked off at Azul for no reason at all.
How many times do I have to go through it?
> Merm, what exaclty have I said?
Bloody hell, you kicked off at Azul for no reason at all.
How many times do I have to go through it?
Okay, sorry guys.
It's just my Welsh side coming out.
It's just my Welsh side coming out.
Apple Crumble wrote:
> Apple Crumble: Hi Highly Exciteable, I've done another one today
> (story). It's called she, it's quite good.
>
> Azul: I done one today, it's called your mum.
I never, ever, ever do your mum jokes.
They're the most tacky thing ever.
Yer maw is all I use, and it's only to other Scots normally, so...
> Apple Crumble: Hi Highly Exciteable, I've done another one today
> (story). It's called she, it's quite good.
>
> Azul: I done one today, it's called your mum.
I never, ever, ever do your mum jokes.
They're the most tacky thing ever.
Yer maw is all I use, and it's only to other Scots normally, so...
Edgy, I thought Grandprix was meant to be the master of calm. Has the torch been passed down?
Come on AC calm the funk down.
Just "ignore user" if you have to. Don't clutter the forums.
I'm off to watch East is East now the boom surrounding this post has seemed to die down.
Just "ignore user" if you have to. Don't clutter the forums.
I'm off to watch East is East now the boom surrounding this post has seemed to die down.
Oh no Edgy, I just said that because I did.
They just keep on and on and on....
*yawn*
They just keep on and on and on....
*yawn*
Apple Crumble, as much as I enjoy a good online argument, I don't let it get to me.
Infact, I have a right laugh at the responses I get in the arguments I sometimes partake in.
If your blood is boiling then you're obviously taking things too serious, and chances are the others are laughing at you.
So all I'm gonna suggest is you calm down. If they continue to provoke, then it just shows them up as prats :P
Infact, I have a right laugh at the responses I get in the arguments I sometimes partake in.
If your blood is boiling then you're obviously taking things too serious, and chances are the others are laughing at you.
So all I'm gonna suggest is you calm down. If they continue to provoke, then it just shows them up as prats :P
Merm, what exaclty have I said?
Nothing stupid.
'Tis Azul.
You don't seem to understand.
Can you just die please?
Nothing stupid.
'Tis Azul.
You don't seem to understand.
Can you just die please?
Dringo wrote:
> Apple Crumble wrote:
>
> Please just stop. Your stupidity is killing me.
>
> This is finish Crumble. Now bow your head, say sorry to merm and Azul
> and just continue on your merry way.
>
> Go on.
>
> Stop littering the forums with pointless insults.
Say Sorry? You having a laugh?
> Apple Crumble wrote:
>
> Please just stop. Your stupidity is killing me.
>
> This is finish Crumble. Now bow your head, say sorry to merm and Azul
> and just continue on your merry way.
>
> Go on.
>
> Stop littering the forums with pointless insults.
Say Sorry? You having a laugh?
Page: