The "Xbox Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
8.1 for Conker and the multiplayer's no fun.....suck much?
[URL]http://xbox.ign.com/articles/626/626725p1.html[/URL]
I always thought the multiplayer looked pretty guff.
[URL]http://xbox.ign.com/articles/626/626725p1.html[/URL]
I always thought the multiplayer looked pretty guff.
Page:
1. It's IGN (They think games like Crash 'N' Burn are Burnout clones simply because the graphics are similar)
2. IGN are really inconsistant now.
3. Complicated multiplayer? OH NOES!!!111
4. Like most multiplayer it's going to be down to who you play it with.
5. It was originally an N64 title that got something like 9.9, you think a re-approached version getting 8.1 6 years later is BAD!?
2. IGN are really inconsistant now.
3. Complicated multiplayer? OH NOES!!!111
4. Like most multiplayer it's going to be down to who you play it with.
5. It was originally an N64 title that got something like 9.9, you think a re-approached version getting 8.1 6 years later is BAD!?
Readers are giving it 9.1 - And the IGN review seemed a little whiney to me (like the review for GTA3 on the PC IGN)
The demo I played was a lot of fun - so I'm definitly intending to pick it up
The demo I played was a lot of fun - so I'm definitly intending to pick it up
Yep, important to note that the reviewer loved the original.
It would have been interesting to see a review/2nd opinion by someone who never played the original to see how they rated it.
It would have been interesting to see a review/2nd opinion by someone who never played the original to see how they rated it.
I was only 11 when BFD came out.
Page: