The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Firstly my system:
Asus A8N-SLI (not deluxe)
Athlon 64 3800+
Cosair Value 1024MB memory
gyga-byte 6600gt
Now, I wasn't sure what to expect when I built this system recently, but in 'modern' games I get an average of 50-70fps with detail set to medium, AND 50-70fps with detail set to very high. No real difference.
Does 50-70fps look right for modern games (and old ones like FarCry and Joint Operations) for the 6600GT? My last score in 3dmarks03 was 8400 by the way.
In Joint Operations I get around 50-80fps on just about any detail level.
Unreal Tour 2004 = 90-200fps on any detail level.
Asus A8N-SLI (not deluxe)
Athlon 64 3800+
Cosair Value 1024MB memory
gyga-byte 6600gt
Now, I wasn't sure what to expect when I built this system recently, but in 'modern' games I get an average of 50-70fps with detail set to medium, AND 50-70fps with detail set to very high. No real difference.
Does 50-70fps look right for modern games (and old ones like FarCry and Joint Operations) for the 6600GT? My last score in 3dmarks03 was 8400 by the way.
In Joint Operations I get around 50-80fps on just about any detail level.
Unreal Tour 2004 = 90-200fps on any detail level.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> So you'll get tearing.
Sounds painful.
> So you'll get tearing.
Sounds painful.
I honestly can't understand how someone could expect a card that costs about £140 (or less?) would offer such astoundingly amazing performance in modern games.
WickedWare wrote:
> vsync is disabled.
So you'll get tearing.
> vsync is disabled.
So you'll get tearing.
vsync is disabled.
WickedWare wrote:
> I wish it did 200-300fps in todays games, and maybe 150 under stress.
That's spectacularly pointless, given that your monitor probably doesn't update more than 85 times a second.
> I wish it did 200-300fps in todays games, and maybe 150 under stress.
That's spectacularly pointless, given that your monitor probably doesn't update more than 85 times a second.
I wish it did 200-300fps in todays games, and maybe 150 under stress.
Yeh, that seems about right.
You have to remember that most games are designed to run at around 60 fps.
You have to remember that most games are designed to run at around 60 fps.
Firstly my system:
Asus A8N-SLI (not deluxe)
Athlon 64 3800+
Cosair Value 1024MB memory
gyga-byte 6600gt
Now, I wasn't sure what to expect when I built this system recently, but in 'modern' games I get an average of 50-70fps with detail set to medium, AND 50-70fps with detail set to very high. No real difference.
Does 50-70fps look right for modern games (and old ones like FarCry and Joint Operations) for the 6600GT? My last score in 3dmarks03 was 8400 by the way.
In Joint Operations I get around 50-80fps on just about any detail level.
Unreal Tour 2004 = 90-200fps on any detail level.
Asus A8N-SLI (not deluxe)
Athlon 64 3800+
Cosair Value 1024MB memory
gyga-byte 6600gt
Now, I wasn't sure what to expect when I built this system recently, but in 'modern' games I get an average of 50-70fps with detail set to medium, AND 50-70fps with detail set to very high. No real difference.
Does 50-70fps look right for modern games (and old ones like FarCry and Joint Operations) for the 6600GT? My last score in 3dmarks03 was 8400 by the way.
In Joint Operations I get around 50-80fps on just about any detail level.
Unreal Tour 2004 = 90-200fps on any detail level.