The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Halo 2'.
Don't know if this has been put up yet...
But I got OXM through the post on saturday and Halo 2 has got...
10/10.
Haven't read the review, just looked at the score.
But I got OXM through the post on saturday and Halo 2 has got...
10/10.
Haven't read the review, just looked at the score.
Page:
*reads the post*
10/10
Are you sure?
10/10 means a perfect game that everyone will love.
I know plenty of people who wont be getting Halo 2.
XBM 10/10 yes, but not OXM. Someone said it had 9.7/10 and the 'lakc of multiplayr bots' was a downfall.
10/10
Are you sure?
10/10 means a perfect game that everyone will love.
I know plenty of people who wont be getting Halo 2.
XBM 10/10 yes, but not OXM. Someone said it had 9.7/10 and the 'lakc of multiplayr bots' was a downfall.
With a game like this the score in a magazine doesnt matter. We are all going to buy it so judge it for yourself. Not like we need a review to decide whether we are going to buy it. Stuff the Microsoft tainted review! Just bring on the game
bobaling wrote:
> Oxm may give some games fair reviews but didnt it give panzer dragon
> orta
> or whatever it is 9.5 that is rubbish it is an appalling game
they gave it 8.8 which is a low score for a gem like this!
> Oxm may give some games fair reviews but didnt it give panzer dragon
> orta
> or whatever it is 9.5 that is rubbish it is an appalling game
they gave it 8.8 which is a low score for a gem like this!
Cyclone wrote:
> OXM are true morons - they loved every 'Only on Xbox' game if they got
> the slightest wink from MS.
Not true. They hated that truly terrible "Stake".
> OXM are true morons - they loved every 'Only on Xbox' game if they got
> the slightest wink from MS.
Not true. They hated that truly terrible "Stake".
I don't really trust official magazines when it comes to big exclusives.
(Sorry for all the posts) :D
I think that they shouldn't do scores at all actually.
They should just say :
Halo 2 - Bets Xbox game ever, excellent.
PES4 - Best Footie game ever, wonderful.
Like that....yeah.
Um.
I think that they shouldn't do scores at all actually.
They should just say :
Halo 2 - Bets Xbox game ever, excellent.
PES4 - Best Footie game ever, wonderful.
Like that....yeah.
Um.
Cyclone wrote:
> I always feel the /10 system is too imprecise.
Me too.
They should score games in percentages, eg. Instead of just rounding up Halo to 10/10 they could give it a more precise score of 99.6% or something...
> I always feel the /10 system is too imprecise.
Me too.
They should score games in percentages, eg. Instead of just rounding up Halo to 10/10 they could give it a more precise score of 99.6% or something...
sPiKeCaSt wrote:
> Anyone who says Blinx is remotely good is retarded, bloody awful
> game.
I thought everyone liked it actually, I really hated it, it was so boring just going around sweeping up...'things'.
I actually felt bad when I got it for my cousin's birthday...
> Anyone who says Blinx is remotely good is retarded, bloody awful
> game.
I thought everyone liked it actually, I really hated it, it was so boring just going around sweeping up...'things'.
I actually felt bad when I got it for my cousin's birthday...
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> They review games whilst ear shafting Bill Gates with their fingers
> rammed up his ass.
Ouch...
> They review games whilst ear shafting Bill Gates with their fingers
> rammed up his ass.
Ouch...
Oxm may give some games fair reviews but didnt it give panzer dragon orta
or whatever it is 9.5 that is rubbish it is an appalling game
or whatever it is 9.5 that is rubbish it is an appalling game
Page: