Viewing Thread:
"You would, wouldn't you?"

Top Poster list says:-

69 Lucy-Jane 179 5276

Yep. I would.

Is it in feet and inches or meters

offence intended, ure an idiot

Cong_Man wrote:
> Top Poster list says:-
>
> 69 Lucy-Jane 179 5276
>
> Yep. I would.

I dont even know Lucy-Jane but I probably still would!

Flock has a bitter taste in his mouth as we speak.

It seems that there are, indeed, new levels of crapness I never knew existed.
Thanks for at least pointing that out, Cong.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It seems that there are, indeed, new levels of crapness I never knew
> existed.
> Thanks for at least pointing that out, Cong.

Nose wrote:
> I take it it's your goal to make these forums as mind numbingly awful
> and just...crap as possible?

Sheesh, you lot are rather unmerciful today. It's not like I post as much rubbish on a regular basis as half the people in here.

*Sulks*.

You know I would, Cong...

Hedfix wrote:
> Flock has a bitter taste in his mouth as we speak.

Why do you always have to bring me into these sordid sex threads, i'm as pure as the driven snow, stop trying to corrupt me!

Flock wrote:
> i'm
> as pure as the driven snow

that's the kids, not you.

By the way Cong, what do you mean "You would", you are married to her and frankly it's expected of you that you already have.