The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Any help would be great :)
> I've found out you can protect files on a web page by using
> javascript. I'm a lot more happy with this (rather than .htaccess)
> but I was just wondering if the users browser does not support
> javascript would the protection e useless?
Well it'll depend upon your javascript of course and what its doing but generally yes, if you're relying on javascript to do something and the user has it turned off then you've no longer got that functionality.
Btw, just had a read of your previous posts, htaccess is still the best way to cope with this (if your host supports it). The general thing you're looking to prevent is called hotlinking. The most common use is to stop people linking to images (from outside of the site) but you could equally use it for what you're doing. If you google for "hotlinking htaccess" you'll find lots of nice solutions, nothing to do with user logins or anything.
Am I making sense :I?
I just want people not to be able download the wml file, find out the name of the file it's linked to and then use that name to download the content. That's why I doubt a login feature using .htaccess will be of much use.
Any ideas
> ...Also if it's Freeola then .htaccess won't work either,
> it'll just break your webspace.
We've been there before: [URL]http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php?threadid=122398&forumid=206[/URL]
> Marzman wrote:
> Darn, they don't. Any other way?
>
> Isn't .htaccess universal? I'm sure that would protect them.
If it's Windows then it won't work, security with Windows is horrible. Also if it's Freeola then .htaccess won't work either, it'll just break your webspace.
> Darn, they don't. Any other way?
Isn't .htaccess universal? I'm sure that would protect them.