The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The message saying something about imagine waking up to this after election day.Vote for Labour
Well I guess I'd better not vote for Micheal Howard then...
Next I come across one with Tony Blair's face on, with the most evil grin you could ever imagine. This came with a message along the lines off "You're going to trust this man for another 4 years. What WERE you thinking?Vote Conservative
Well, I guess I'd better not vote for Tony Blair then...
Then I come across a few Lib Dem posters:
"We oppose: reaching targets. We propose: reaching patients"
"We oppose: Top up fees. We propose: Education for all" (or something along those lines.)
Sounds good. No Howard or Blair there so I guess I'll...
Okies, so that was a simple minded scenario.
But it does show the attitude of the parties.
To be honest, I don't trust either Blair or Howard at the moment and their nitpicking bull**** throwing attitude doesn't help that at all.
Lib Dems on the other hand seem to be campaigning with/for honesty and constructively.
Now there's the possibility that I'm being taken in by a new form of "bull****", and even with the Lib Dems I wouldn't go as far to take EVERYTHING at face value. But atleast they're campaigning with a hint of twist, rather than basing a whole campaign around it.
The message saying something about imagine waking up to this after election day.Vote for Labour
Well I guess I'd better not vote for Micheal Howard then...
Next I come across one with Tony Blair's face on, with the most evil grin you could ever imagine. This came with a message along the lines off "You're going to trust this man for another 4 years. What WERE you thinking?Vote Conservative
Well, I guess I'd better not vote for Tony Blair then...
Then I come across a few Lib Dem posters:
"We oppose: reaching targets. We propose: reaching patients"
"We oppose: Top up fees. We propose: Education for all" (or something along those lines.)
Sounds good. No Howard or Blair there so I guess I'll...
Okies, so that was a simple minded scenario.
But it does show the attitude of the parties.
To be honest, I don't trust either Blair or Howard at the moment and their nitpicking bull**** throwing attitude doesn't help that at all.
Lib Dems on the other hand seem to be campaigning with/for honesty and constructively.
Now there's the possibility that I'm being taken in by a new form of "bull****", and even with the Lib Dems I wouldn't go as far to take EVERYTHING at face value. But atleast they're campaigning with a hint of twist, rather than basing a whole campaign around it.
So yes, the Lib Dems seem the sensible choice. It's good that they've not resorted to a slanging match like Cons' and Labour and are instead concentrating on really important things.
Labour's main policy at the moment is "vote us to stop the Tories getting in". Unfortunately, quite a lot of people will bow to that.
Maybe 9 people isn't enough to get a party in though..
They're no better.
"Vote for Tony Blair. If anyone asks why, then just walk away'."
[URL]http://www.videovista.net/articles/theylive.jpg[/URL]
Ant wrote:
> Meh, saw a party election broadcast from the Lib Dems earlier today
> moaning about WMD and how the Tories went along with it.
>
> They're no better.
I don't know...
I seem to remember that guy who was Tory leader at the time (was it Ian Duncan Smith?) saying that he agreed with the war when the vote was passed (and then having a go at Tony afterwards). Supposedly the LibDems still said no, as a party, but I've probably got something wrong...
I think that the best thing about the Lib Dems is they're approaching it as the party who has a slight chance, but only a slight chance. You can tell that Labour and Conservative see it as a two horse race and merely want to crash each other down, and reckon that'll ensure them victory.
Lib Dems are the only ones who campaign by saying what they'll do, not by saying what the other's won't do in some immature, hair-pulling, pesudo-macho pathetic one-upmanship. Rargh.
Too young though. Asshats.
Apparently (although it did come from the Lib Dems ... but still, a more reliable source than many) if all the people who were thinking of voting for them actually did so, they'd win quite muchly.
Which is another thing I hate, tactical voting. Vote for who you want, that's the whole point.