The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Lo all, just wanted a quick browser test on this before I get too far into development:
[URL]http://dev.digital-prozac.co.uk/[/URL]
I've checked it in FF 1.0.2/Mozilla/Camino & IE 6.2, specifically loomking for a screener from Safari.
[URL]http://dev.digital-prozac.co.uk/[/URL]
I've checked it in FF 1.0.2/Mozilla/Camino & IE 6.2, specifically loomking for a screener from Safari.
Page:
Lo all, just wanted a quick browser test on this before I get too far into development:
[URL]http://dev.digital-prozac.co.uk/[/URL]
I've checked it in FF 1.0.2/Mozilla/Camino & IE 6.2, specifically loomking for a screener from Safari.
[URL]http://dev.digital-prozac.co.uk/[/URL]
I've checked it in FF 1.0.2/Mozilla/Camino & IE 6.2, specifically loomking for a screener from Safari.
works with AOL 9.0 :D
Bloody hell, that's nice.
Looks fine in IE6, IE5.5, IE5, Opera 7.5ish and Netscape 7.2, on XP Home SP2, though in IE 5 the nav menu is a little to the right until you mouse over it, at which point it'll correct itself.
(IE 6.2? Do you mean XP SP2's version?)
Looks fine in IE6, IE5.5, IE5, Opera 7.5ish and Netscape 7.2, on XP Home SP2, though in IE 5 the nav menu is a little to the right until you mouse over it, at which point it'll correct itself.
(IE 6.2? Do you mean XP SP2's version?)
cjh wrote:
> Bloody hell, that's nice.
Cheers
> (IE 6.2? Do you mean XP SP2's version?)
IE 6.02 SP2 missed the "0"
> Bloody hell, that's nice.
Cheers
> (IE 6.2? Do you mean XP SP2's version?)
IE 6.02 SP2 missed the "0"
Are the images your own work?
BTW, would this be the site you had branded as 'coming in jan 2004' a couple of weeks ago :)
BTW, would this be the site you had branded as 'coming in jan 2004' a couple of weeks ago :)
cjh wrote:
> Are the images your own work?
>
> BTW, would this be the site you had branded as 'coming in jan 2004' a
> couple of weeks ago :)
Indeed, all my own work including the images seen. Was last branded as "Coming, Honest..." but due to going full time freelance, I thought it better to get my site up and done this week. Should be live by Friday!;)
Not bad for 2 years work!;)
> Are the images your own work?
>
> BTW, would this be the site you had branded as 'coming in jan 2004' a
> couple of weeks ago :)
Indeed, all my own work including the images seen. Was last branded as "Coming, Honest..." but due to going full time freelance, I thought it better to get my site up and done this week. Should be live by Friday!;)
Not bad for 2 years work!;)
Why is it multi-language?
Looks good and everything seems to fit in Safari 1.2.4. [URL]http://timmargh.net/files/digitalprozac.jpg[/URL] - my mouse was over the "home" link.
The blue George Bernard-Shaw quote overruns the bottom of it's container in Opera 7.54 on my Linux machine, but that's because I force my browser to display text at a minimum size of 12 pixels tall. This is due to ukchatforums.com buggy font sizes that are masked by Windows font-rendering but get displayed in all their teeny-tiny glory in Linux. I should post something in site bugs, but I cba :0/
This.Celluloid.Dream wrote:
> Why is it multi-language?
as in:
means it's in English (British)
> Why is it multi-language?
as in:
means it's in English (British)
Page: