The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Oooooooh, She's a good momma
Page:
RIRAN, you're chronically unfunny.
If you died tomorrow no-one would miss you.
If you died tomorrow no-one would miss you.
hes so unpopular... no one likes him. except maybe his "momma"
Wow, this brings a tear to my eye. Ok, so much to respnd to you'll have to give me time to regain my compsure.
Ok, first point... Vampyr... well you obviously failed maths.
RIRAN = Warned.... No problems there.
RIRAN < ßullett.... a little dubious but i'll let you have this one for now.
Now we've established simultaneous equations we should solve via the substitution method.
We get from substituting RIRAN < ßullett into the previous equation...
< ßullett = Warned or Warned < ßullett... with me so far?
Re-arrange to get ßullett > warned
This implies that ßullett is more than warned. I.e. has been more than warned, and since warned portains to be a bad thing in this forum, ßullett is actually < warned.
Going back to original statement, RIRAN = Warned we get the rather fortunate solution that
RIRAN = Warned > ßullett
Incidentally, I could also prove that Vampyr < Chewing Gum on Boot, but I won't go into that right now...
Next...
"RIRAN, you're chronically unfunny.
If you died tomorrow no-one would miss you."
Well the post right after says...
"that made me laugh"
You're blatently wrong. In fact You're chronically wrong.
Next...
Finally, Vampyr comes back a 'Momma' related post. At least you've decided to stay on topic. Allow me to congratulate you, that made me chuckle, abeit only briefly.
Yo momma so stupid she asked you, "What is the number for 911?"
Ok, first point... Vampyr... well you obviously failed maths.
RIRAN = Warned.... No problems there.
RIRAN < ßullett.... a little dubious but i'll let you have this one for now.
Now we've established simultaneous equations we should solve via the substitution method.
We get from substituting RIRAN < ßullett into the previous equation...
< ßullett = Warned or Warned < ßullett... with me so far?
Re-arrange to get ßullett > warned
This implies that ßullett is more than warned. I.e. has been more than warned, and since warned portains to be a bad thing in this forum, ßullett is actually < warned.
Going back to original statement, RIRAN = Warned we get the rather fortunate solution that
RIRAN = Warned > ßullett
Incidentally, I could also prove that Vampyr < Chewing Gum on Boot, but I won't go into that right now...
Next...
"RIRAN, you're chronically unfunny.
If you died tomorrow no-one would miss you."
Well the post right after says...
"that made me laugh"
You're blatently wrong. In fact You're chronically wrong.
Next...
Finally, Vampyr comes back a 'Momma' related post. At least you've decided to stay on topic. Allow me to congratulate you, that made me chuckle, abeit only briefly.
Yo momma so stupid she asked you, "What is the number for 911?"
RIRAN wrote:
> Wow, this brings a tear to my eye. Ok, so much to respnd to you'll
> have to give me time to regain my compsure.
>
> Ok, first point... Vampyr... well you obviously failed maths.
You may find i got an A* at GCSE and am predicted an A at A-level. also i am so cool i got Gold in the maths challenge and was the youngets in the school to do so.
> RIRAN = Warned.... No problems there.
> RIRAN < ßullett.... a little dubious but i'll let you have
> this one for now.
>
> Now we've established simultaneous equations we should solve via the
> substitution method.
>
> We get from substituting RIRAN < ßullett into the previous
> equation...
>
> < ßullett = Warned or Warned < ßullett... with me
> so far?
>
> Re-arrange to get ßullett warned
>
> This implies that ßullett is more than warned. I.e. has been
> more than warned, and since warned portains to be a bad thing in this
> forum, ßullett is actually < warned.
this is incorrect. you cannot rearrange an inequality by changing the sign simply because circumstances dictate. it must be done in a mathematical manner, e.g. multiplying by -1
> Incidentally, I could also prove that Vampyr < Chewing Gum on
> Boot, but I won't go into that right now...
again, this is not possible as chewing gum on boot is part of "all" which i am greater than
> Wow, this brings a tear to my eye. Ok, so much to respnd to you'll
> have to give me time to regain my compsure.
>
> Ok, first point... Vampyr... well you obviously failed maths.
You may find i got an A* at GCSE and am predicted an A at A-level. also i am so cool i got Gold in the maths challenge and was the youngets in the school to do so.
> RIRAN = Warned.... No problems there.
> RIRAN < ßullett.... a little dubious but i'll let you have
> this one for now.
>
> Now we've established simultaneous equations we should solve via the
> substitution method.
>
> We get from substituting RIRAN < ßullett into the previous
> equation...
>
> < ßullett = Warned or Warned < ßullett... with me
> so far?
>
> Re-arrange to get ßullett warned
>
> This implies that ßullett is more than warned. I.e. has been
> more than warned, and since warned portains to be a bad thing in this
> forum, ßullett is actually < warned.
this is incorrect. you cannot rearrange an inequality by changing the sign simply because circumstances dictate. it must be done in a mathematical manner, e.g. multiplying by -1
> Incidentally, I could also prove that Vampyr < Chewing Gum on
> Boot, but I won't go into that right now...
again, this is not possible as chewing gum on boot is part of "all" which i am greater than
You may well have gotten a la-di-da A* at GCSE but I am far superierer with an A at A2 level, but do I request midgets to shine my boobs for it? No, well there is the odd Wednesday. Incidently, I checked RIRAN's equation and found it to be top notch work and his thinking was more upbeat than Sir Peter Robin Steven Hawkings OBE. A summarised version of the Cinimeisters La can be found here. [URL]http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf[/URL]
Page: