The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This film looks excellent.
[URL] http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0360486/trailers [/URL]
Neo/Cardboard actor man's back with what looks like it could be another sleeper hit.
[URL] http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0360486/trailers [/URL]
Neo/Cardboard actor man's back with what looks like it could be another sleeper hit.
Page:
1. It looks like you didn't like the way Constantine was used.
2. Your use of sarcasm in this case was absolutely terrible.
2. Your use of sarcasm in this case was absolutely terrible.
Drexyl wrote:
> I thought that "Constantine" actually meant something. When
> I found out that it was actually called "Constantine"
> because he is called John Constantine, I gave up any hope.
Ok then. I have come to be rather annoyed with film cliches, especially the one with the main character being called John because the main character has a tendancy to be a "tough guy" and the name John aids this image. Constantine looked to be a smart film with an original story and original ideas, that was until I realised that the main character was called John. You see where I'm going with this yet?
"I gave up any hope."
Maybe YOU just don't understand what sarcasm is.
> I thought that "Constantine" actually meant something. When
> I found out that it was actually called "Constantine"
> because he is called John Constantine, I gave up any hope.
Ok then. I have come to be rather annoyed with film cliches, especially the one with the main character being called John because the main character has a tendancy to be a "tough guy" and the name John aids this image. Constantine looked to be a smart film with an original story and original ideas, that was until I realised that the main character was called John. You see where I'm going with this yet?
"I gave up any hope."
Maybe YOU just don't understand what sarcasm is.
But you have you idiot. Tell me how you meant that first post then.
Wink wrote:
> Read your original post you contradictory nobhead.
What's your point? There is nothing in there that says I think the film will be crap because of the name Constantine. If you've read it that way then you're thick.
> Read your original post you contradictory nobhead.
What's your point? There is nothing in there that says I think the film will be crap because of the name Constantine. If you've read it that way then you're thick.
Read your original post you contradictory nobhead.
Wink wrote:
> Constantine is his name? Oh dear god I give up this has to be crap.
I think the main character being called John has become a bit of a cliche, that's all. Nothing to do with the name Constantine.
> Constantine is his name? Oh dear god I give up this has to be crap.
I think the main character being called John has become a bit of a cliche, that's all. Nothing to do with the name Constantine.
Constantine is his name? Oh dear god I give up this has to be crap.
Wink wrote:
> And? Your comment about you not liking the film is retarded.
How?
> And? Your comment about you not liking the film is retarded.
How?
And? Your comment about you not liking the film is retarded.
Wink wrote:
> One day when you realise how retarded your second post is I would take
> that seriously. Either you don't understand sarcasm or you're so
> unimaginative that you can't even think of anything to reply with.
The only "retarded" thing I can see around here is you. I don't take nicely to insults, sarcasm or not.
> One day when you realise how retarded your second post is I would take
> that seriously. Either you don't understand sarcasm or you're so
> unimaginative that you can't even think of anything to reply with.
The only "retarded" thing I can see around here is you. I don't take nicely to insults, sarcasm or not.
Page: