The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I made this thread just so we can all laugh at anything J.R says that doesnt make sense, considering that he never knows what he is saying nowadays this should hopefully be a popular thread!
Page:
Hillfish wrote:
> On Raw this week i believe that when snitsky, triple h and flair
> surrounded the ring (with batista in it) with steel chairs. Jr then
> says:
>
> "The way things are looking we won't be seing snitsky at
> Wrestlemania"
>
> Not word 4 word but Jr said something like that.
He does seem to get confused as to whose wrestling at times!
I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
> On Raw this week i believe that when snitsky, triple h and flair
> surrounded the ring (with batista in it) with steel chairs. Jr then
> says:
>
> "The way things are looking we won't be seing snitsky at
> Wrestlemania"
>
> Not word 4 word but Jr said something like that.
He does seem to get confused as to whose wrestling at times!
I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
Hillfish wrote:
> On Raw this week i believe that when snitsky, triple h and flair
> surrounded the ring (with batista in it) with steel chairs. Jr then
> says:
>
> "The way things are looking we won't be seing snitsky at
> Wrestlemania"
>
> Not word 4 word but Jr said something like that.
He does seem to get confused as to whose wrestling at times!
I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
> On Raw this week i believe that when snitsky, triple h and flair
> surrounded the ring (with batista in it) with steel chairs. Jr then
> says:
>
> "The way things are looking we won't be seing snitsky at
> Wrestlemania"
>
> Not word 4 word but Jr said something like that.
He does seem to get confused as to whose wrestling at times!
I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
Smedlos wrote:
> I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen
> where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
King's commentary is bloody awful. He doesn't know the names of about 90% of the moves, seems to have lost the ability to use the devastating one-liners he once had and never puts anybody over. In other words, he's a waste of a microphone. It really says a lot that he's the worst commentator of an abysmal 3-man team...
> I prefer Kings commentary though as JR knows what's going to happen
> where as King doesn't so his commentary is spontaneous.
King's commentary is bloody awful. He doesn't know the names of about 90% of the moves, seems to have lost the ability to use the devastating one-liners he once had and never puts anybody over. In other words, he's a waste of a microphone. It really says a lot that he's the worst commentator of an abysmal 3-man team...
For an ex-wrestler he should know the names. Like Tazz. He knows and describes moves like Mr Kennedy Kennedy's finisher, he describes as a inverted samoan drop and stuff like that. At least he tries. JR knows mostly moves that have Oaklahoma in the title.
Page: