Viewing Thread:
"who owns perfect dark and banjo"

who actually owns the rights to make sequals to perfect dark and banjo cuz i really want to see a sequel to them , oh and who actually 'owns' the goldeneye game , cuz isnt there any way that E.A can actually do something right for once and like re do it for the new generation * but without changing a THING , just a simple port , mebe with online play*

Yes I know, but they are lenient with them to an extent. Rare still develop for the GBA for example.

What I meant was, it depends on how much 'freedom to develop' MS will give Rare. i.e. letting them develop for the Gamecube if it meant an Xbox release too perhaps.

I think MS are having Rare bring Perfect Dark:Zero to Xbox, meaning it's unlikely Nintendo will be able to negotiate that contract.

Banjo , maybe - but it depends on how much MS have got Rare under their thumb.

The new Goldeneye looks like a botched job. The original is by Rare who always made good games, but the new one is obviously EA who make less than good games most of the time. I think that Ninty should somehow buy the rights to Banjo and Perfect Dark and make sequals. I dont know if its possible to do but if they could it would be good for us, and moneymaking for Nintendo no doubt.

TimClarke_007 wrote:
> who actually owns the rights to make sequals to perfect dark and banjo

Rare. Those people that work for Microsoft.

who actually owns the rights to make sequals to perfect dark and banjo cuz i really want to see a sequel to them , oh and who actually 'owns' the goldeneye game , cuz isnt there any way that E.A can actually do something right for once and like re do it for the new generation * but without changing a THING , just a simple port , mebe with online play*