The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Rank Current Nickname Posts Words
1 Hedfix 1922 54315
2 Dringo 903 62102
3 ßulle†† 782 20076
1 Hedfix 1922 54315
2 Dringo 903 62102
3 ßulle†† 782 20076
Page:
gamesfreak wrote:
> If I see a post by some prestigous member like
> rah/Goatboy/Dringo/Mav/Cookie Monster/Paradox/SHEEPY
Kickass.
Mentioned before Goatboy.
I can die a happy happy man now.
> If I see a post by some prestigous member like
> rah/Goatboy/Dringo/Mav/Cookie Monster/Paradox/SHEEPY
Kickass.
Mentioned before Goatboy.
I can die a happy happy man now.
Hedfix wrote:
> Ha ha!
>
> I can't believe Phillip has actually remembered some of bizarre
> posts.
>
> Yes in that thread someone said something that was puzzling, and?
>
> Phillip are you some kind of robot who only reads things without tone
> or considering that something might be a reference to something you
> know nothing about?
Nope, I just clicked on a forum and scanned the 'last message bit,' I chose one of the many 'Last Post: Hedfix' posts and just copied the post.
It's not hard.
"That sucks."
> Ha ha!
>
> I can't believe Phillip has actually remembered some of bizarre
> posts.
>
> Yes in that thread someone said something that was puzzling, and?
>
> Phillip are you some kind of robot who only reads things without tone
> or considering that something might be a reference to something you
> know nothing about?
Nope, I just clicked on a forum and scanned the 'last message bit,' I chose one of the many 'Last Post: Hedfix' posts and just copied the post.
It's not hard.
"That sucks."
Clazon wrote:
> Odd choice of words. I skim through everything looking for a key
> word. Reputation too adds to it. If I like the poster, then I already
> have an idea it's probably worth reading.
I do that.
If I see a post by some prestigous member like rah/Goatboy/Dringo/Mav/Cookie Monster/Paradox/SHEEPY (the list goes on and on) then I'll usually read it first before moving down the chain to the crap posters or the posters that I never usually bother with.
> Odd choice of words. I skim through everything looking for a key
> word. Reputation too adds to it. If I like the poster, then I already
> have an idea it's probably worth reading.
I do that.
If I see a post by some prestigous member like rah/Goatboy/Dringo/Mav/Cookie Monster/Paradox/SHEEPY (the list goes on and on) then I'll usually read it first before moving down the chain to the crap posters or the posters that I never usually bother with.
I see this a lot on these forums now. It goes a little something like this:
"X sees that Y likes live/a game/subject on this forum more than X and finds it to be more fun than X thinks it is.
X comes to the conclusion that Y is somehow 'sad' because Y doesn't share exactly the same opinions as X and can get more fun/interest out of things that X can't"
and that's about that.
Worth getting worked up about? I think not.
"X sees that Y likes live/a game/subject on this forum more than X and finds it to be more fun than X thinks it is.
X comes to the conclusion that Y is somehow 'sad' because Y doesn't share exactly the same opinions as X and can get more fun/interest out of things that X can't"
and that's about that.
Worth getting worked up about? I think not.
Ha ha!
I can't believe Phillip has actually remembered some of bizarre posts.
Yes in that thread someone said something that was puzzling, and?
Phillip are you some kind of robot who only reads things without tone or considering that something might be a reference to something you know nothing about?
...oh hang on, I'm running a bit long time to continue in another post. :D
I can't believe Phillip has actually remembered some of bizarre posts.
Yes in that thread someone said something that was puzzling, and?
Phillip are you some kind of robot who only reads things without tone or considering that something might be a reference to something you know nothing about?
...oh hang on, I'm running a bit long time to continue in another post. :D
It only works out at 1 post every 20 minutes.
General Chat really is full of dull mundane uninteresting pointless crap, and it's usually posted by the same people over and over. CM being one of them.
boring
boring
It's true. I often come into General Chat to find the right hand side column repeating the name 'Cong Man' and to be honest most of the replies aren't exactly relevant to the topic. :(
Cong Man wrote:
> 1. Quality NOT Quantity
>
> and
>
> 2. It's not how often you post, it's what you post that matters.
>
> Now, the next time any of you feel the need to reply in a thread
> without having anything worthwhile to say, take a deep breathe and
> ask yourself if you're adding anything to the thread. Even if you
> only do it once, that'll be one less waste of space I'll have to
> read.
So how come a majority of your replies are pointless?
> 1. Quality NOT Quantity
>
> and
>
> 2. It's not how often you post, it's what you post that matters.
>
> Now, the next time any of you feel the need to reply in a thread
> without having anything worthwhile to say, take a deep breathe and
> ask yourself if you're adding anything to the thread. Even if you
> only do it once, that'll be one less waste of space I'll have to
> read.
So how come a majority of your replies are pointless?
Cong Man wrote:
> I'll have to read.
Odd choice of words. I skim through everything looking for a key word. Reputation too adds to it. If I like the poster, then I already have an idea it's probably worth reading.
> I'll have to read.
Odd choice of words. I skim through everything looking for a key word. Reputation too adds to it. If I like the poster, then I already have an idea it's probably worth reading.
Page: