Viewing Thread:
"Really sad, but which Nathan Barley ads have you seen?"

Saw one just now where he claimed to be like the "original Bill Hicks", which made me titter. Should be good, but it's a crap name.

SHEEPY wrote:
> Looks rubbish

Seconded. Looks really, really pants.

Pandaemonium wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Should be good, but it's a crap
> name.
>
> Yeah, but the original Charlie Brooker name for it is c***.

Uh-huh, really? For you see I have been trapped under a rock on Mars for the last 100 years.

Looks rubbish

Pandaemonium wrote:
>
> Yeah, but the original Charlie Brooker name for it is c***. You won't
> see that in the Radio Times.

There are always plenty of c***'s in the Radio Times.

monkey_man wrote:
> Should be good, but it's a crap
> name.

Yeah, but the original Charlie Brooker name for it is c***. You won't see that in the Radio Times.

[URL]http://www.tvgohome.com/0911-2001.html[/URL]

This Friday.
Can't say I'm wetting myself over it.

Um, just the one, where it flashes "Nathan Barley" for a second. Oh well.

Any clues to when it starts?

Saw one just now where he claimed to be like the "original Bill Hicks", which made me titter. Should be good, but it's a crap name.