The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Here's your chance to campaign for your selected candidate in the forthcoming Notable election.
I'm behind young er-no, figuratively speaking, because he's a cheeky so and so and full of himself. He won't set a very good example as a Notable, but the criteria is - "who made the place interesting".
So Vote er-yes to er-no.
I'm behind young er-no, figuratively speaking, because he's a cheeky so and so and full of himself. He won't set a very good example as a Notable, but the criteria is - "who made the place interesting".
So Vote er-yes to er-no.
Page:
Certainly a significant safety measure added there!
Tony wrote:
I'm behind young er-no,
Ummm!!!! *scared*
> figuratively speaking,
Thank God you put that! Some sick minded,twisted people could have taken that another way! (me included)
:-)
I'm behind young er-no,
Ummm!!!! *scared*
> figuratively speaking,
Thank God you put that! Some sick minded,twisted people could have taken that another way! (me included)
:-)
Sounds like a good idea, though I think Wookiee Monster should be in with a shot as well!
Here's your chance to campaign for your selected candidate in the forthcoming Notable election.
I'm behind young er-no, figuratively speaking, because he's a cheeky so and so and full of himself. He won't set a very good example as a Notable, but the criteria is - "who made the place interesting".
So Vote er-yes to er-no.
I'm behind young er-no, figuratively speaking, because he's a cheeky so and so and full of himself. He won't set a very good example as a Notable, but the criteria is - "who made the place interesting".
So Vote er-yes to er-no.
Page: