Viewing Thread:
"Pentagon Conspiracy Theory"

I highly recommend you watch this if you haven't seen it before.

[URL]http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm[/URL]

or

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm



Seems pretty feasible to me.

It was a plane you #@&*ing retards, where do you tossfaces get off coming up with idiot stuff like this?
You're probably the same insects that believed that wingdings thing.
Shame on you.

One thing that does puzzle me. Wouldn't the easiest way to make it look like a Boeing 757 was flown into the pentagon be to actually fly a Boeing 757 into the pentagon? Surely its the easier option than firing missiles and staging some big cover up. Or aren't conspiracy theories and common sense compatible.

Watch the twin towers impacts, theres a bit of debry, but not much.

But there should still be huge chucks of aluminium that survived the crash, the wheels I think are made of a strong alloy with a high melting point so I would presume they would still be there.

Another thing. The video has planes crashing, and trys to imply that parts are scattered everywhere. Maybe when they land on ground (as the pictures show), but not one of an impact into a building.

When something hits something else that fast, the amount of force it has would be able to punch holes in concrete walls. You dont know what was in the buildings either, could have been empty...

The wings? They would NEVER survive an impact. They hold alot of fuel and would explode on impact most definatly.

What happens to planes when they impact? They DISINTAGRATE. The majority of the planes materials would vapourise.

Having said that, it really doesnt look like a 747 did that, but, if you watch the twin towers and when the planes his the tower, it leaves a very small hole similar to the one in the pentagon. The wings disintagrate completely, so does the tail.

Also planes arent solid material. Alot of it is hollow (cabins, luggage compartments). Seats would all burn up on impact, as would any flammable material. The only thing that would survive fire would be the main frame of the plane.

Confiscated videos? Thats the FBI's nature. What were you expecting, a worldwide video release at your nearest Apollo video store?

Although it is compelling, and i do love a good conspiracy, i still believe it was a plane.

If you want another good conspiracy, look up the moon landing one, thats pretty good.

Very thought-provoking. The mind can only wonder how many secrets the government (American or otherwise) are hiding from us...

Paradox: wrote:
> Yeah, but it's odd how the Pentagon's CCTV footage was allowed to be
> shown, no?

Perhaps that was fiddled with?
Who knows.

But it does seem feasable indeed. The grass/lack of plane parts etc etc.

It's strange, not sure why there would be a cover up etc

Though some of the stuff as littlre wreckage, just one hole, perfect grass and no CTV getting released make it seem dodgy.

Yeah, but it's odd how the Pentagon's CCTV footage was allowed to be shown, no?