Viewing Thread:
"That Tottenham "goal" thingy"

For those of us without Prem plus, how bad an error was it from the linesman?

Jeff Stelling and co. said that it is the biggest clanger (by a referee) all season.

Thank you. Just it was an amazing defensive performance, not attacking ;)

Spurs played amazing-ly. I'll agree. Any team that can go to Old Trafford and win gets points in my book

(I know, they DREW, but I'm starting a rebel league by myself)

AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> And this comment is now void
>
> Truth hurts huh? you think everyone is against you but they would be
> after the utter cr*p you post week in week out "omigod yu paid
> the linesman!11"
>

not true, i doubt he's on your payroll, its not worth his while. Chelsea pay the officials much better! :-)

And it looks like there's something going on, how could they miss that eh?

I hope there's a full scale FA investigation, sacking for the officials, and 3 points justly awarded to Spurs, we deserve them.

Ahahahaha

Sour grapes methinks, been taking lessons off of Scope.

Well, I think you're sour because obviously we played better than you. Infact, we beat you but for the scummy officials. We obviously defended better than you attacked, and as this was our tactic, we played better than you.

Therefore, you are an a$$hole, I used to respect you as a poster, now you're just a petty child who can't accept the fact Man Utd don't always win.

Good night to you

Lil Bro wrote:
> And this comment is now void

Truth hurts huh? you think everyone is against you but they would be after the utter cr*p you post week in week out "omigod yu paid the linesman!11"

why don't you go bore someone else or go and watch the replay of your 'Amazing Performance' cause im off to bed.

This isn't even the argument at hand.

The argument is, we won, we just weren't given it. However much you paid the linesman to run whilst looking downwards, it worked, well done.

AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> You were lucky not to conceded so many times, Smith should have scored
> twice

Yes, and our brilliant defence stopped him, as well as our keeper

and Bellion when through 1 on 1,

Only a great save by Robbo denied him.

> your own player hit his own post!

we were lucky, yes, but nothing comes close to the luck you had

> if they had scored it would have been 2 or 3 nil, then would
> you have said it was "an amazing performance" no you
> wouldn't.

I don't see your point. It was because of our defending geniusly that you didn't score, thus our performance was amazing, especially if we kept out the number of chances you scumbags had.

Our ineptability to score without Ruud and Rooney was
> clearly the main factor of this being a 0-0.

LOL. No, it was our defence, clearly. Look at the number of vital challenges/interceptions we made to deny you from scoring. yeh we rode our luck a bit, you f**king got away with murder.

> You have look past those white tinted specs of yours and moaning week
> in week out why spurs didnt do this why spurs weren't given that
> cause it's getting pretty boring now.

And this comment is now void, ass wipe

I must admit, the post thing aside, Man U looked about as threatening as Micheal Ricketts.

(edit)

Damn, I forgot that freekick... that you shouldn't have had... because it was STRAIGHT AFTER the goal.

Lil Bro wrote:
> It's true. You think everyone on this planet is against you.

Lil Bro wrote:
> Yeh, c'mon everyone in this sport forum has a thing against me.

Eh? Eh? Eh?