The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Your comments, suggestions and criticisms, please: [URL]http://timmargh.net/[/URL].
It's a work-in-progress.
It's a work-in-progress.
Page:
Coin wrote:
> Liking the banner.
Got it from another site - have yet to ask permission!
> Sweet site. Just not mad about the ammount of white.
Cheers, but I wanted it to be a, erm, light site.
;^)
> Liking the banner.
Got it from another site - have yet to ask permission!
> Sweet site. Just not mad about the ammount of white.
Cheers, but I wanted it to be a, erm, light site.
;^)
Timmargh wrote:
> Very_Metal wrote:
> looks good, but the 3d look of the navigation buttons looks a bit out
> of place with the
> rest of the site. hardly worth changing though :)
>
> I'd been thinking about that myself - have changed it now ;^)
then it seems i stand corrected, it WAS worth changing... go me :)
> Very_Metal wrote:
> looks good, but the 3d look of the navigation buttons looks a bit out
> of place with the
> rest of the site. hardly worth changing though :)
>
> I'd been thinking about that myself - have changed it now ;^)
then it seems i stand corrected, it WAS worth changing... go me :)
Liking the banner.
Sweet site. Just not mad about the ammount of white.
Sweet site. Just not mad about the ammount of white.
That banner image is a lot clearer now. Much better :)
viperfire wrote:
> When you click on the picture of the dog it opens up in the same windows as your
> webpage, I would change it so that when you click the picture it opens in a new window.
I just prefer it that way.
Very_Metal wrote:
> looks good, but the 3d look of the navigation buttons looks a bit out of place with the
> rest of the site. hardly worth changing though :)
I'd been thinking about that myself - have changed it now ;^)
monkey_man wrote:
> Lookin' good! Are the dotted edges meant to shift when I go over them?
Erm, no.
cjh wrote:
> The only thing that I personally would chance is the title image, removing the ! from
> the text, as it may cause a little confusion as to what the web address really is.
Noted and changed.
Everyone else: thanks for your comments.
> When you click on the picture of the dog it opens up in the same windows as your
> webpage, I would change it so that when you click the picture it opens in a new window.
I just prefer it that way.
Very_Metal wrote:
> looks good, but the 3d look of the navigation buttons looks a bit out of place with the
> rest of the site. hardly worth changing though :)
I'd been thinking about that myself - have changed it now ;^)
monkey_man wrote:
> Lookin' good! Are the dotted edges meant to shift when I go over them?
Erm, no.
cjh wrote:
> The only thing that I personally would chance is the title image, removing the ! from
> the text, as it may cause a little confusion as to what the web address really is.
Noted and changed.
Everyone else: thanks for your comments.
monkey_man wrote:
> Are the dotted edges meant to shift when I go over them?
That'll be another IE bug. If you scroll the page up and down, you'll see the lines turn solid every now and then as well.
That's a nice little site you've put together there, good job. The only thing that I personally would change is the title image, removing the ! from the text, as it may cause a little confusion as to what the web address really is.
> Are the dotted edges meant to shift when I go over them?
That'll be another IE bug. If you scroll the page up and down, you'll see the lines turn solid every now and then as well.
That's a nice little site you've put together there, good job. The only thing that I personally would change is the title image, removing the ! from the text, as it may cause a little confusion as to what the web address really is.
Lookin' good! Are the dotted edges meant to shift when I go over them?
looks good, but the 3d look of the navigation buttons looks a bit out of place with the rest of the site.
hardly worth changing though :)
hardly worth changing though :)
Have to say, not mad about the contrast between the body background and the content background, and as a rule I wouldn't use white... But ya know.
Looking good :D.
Looking good :D.
Looks good to me.
Page: