The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I had started the same topic in "Life & Everything" forum. There, I am posting and discussing on this topic in detail. But, my intention to start the same topic here, is to post succinct, less detailed and to the point arguments, and at the same time have more feedback. If you like the matter here, you can read it all in detail in the "Life & Everything" forum.
Some years ago, Father William A. Williams ha written a book named "Evolution of Man Scientifically disproved". I'd try to discuss the follies of this book as epigrammatically as possible, and if you want to read every fact in detail with illustrations, you can always check out the above said forum.
Below is the summary of the summary of the introduction of this book I had made earlier
Succinct Summary of the introduction of Evo. Of Man disproved
This book is designed,
(1) As an up-to-date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and
(2) As an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism.
Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Every theory to which mathematics can be applied will be proved or disproved by this acid test.
Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then probable, then certain. To be a possible theory, it must be reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must be reconcilable with all the facts. Every true theory passes through these three stages,--possibility, probability, and certainty.
All the arguments against evolution in general are valid against the evolution of man. There are many other arguments, that prove the evolution of man impossible, even if the evolution of plants and animals can be proved possible.
Even if every argument in this book were invalid, save one, that one valid argument would overthrow evolution, since every true theory must be reconcilable with all the facts (Note how Father is reacting to the authenticity of his own facts. Guilty conscience – Added by The Winster). One irreconcilable fact is sufficient to overthrow evolution.
The evolution of man is not only a guess, but a very wild one; and it is totally unsupported by any convincing (!) arguments. It can be mathematically demonstrated to be an impossible theory.
Some years ago, Father William A. Williams ha written a book named "Evolution of Man Scientifically disproved". I'd try to discuss the follies of this book as epigrammatically as possible, and if you want to read every fact in detail with illustrations, you can always check out the above said forum.
Below is the summary of the summary of the introduction of this book I had made earlier
Succinct Summary of the introduction of Evo. Of Man disproved
This book is designed,
(1) As an up-to-date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and
(2) As an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism.
Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Every theory to which mathematics can be applied will be proved or disproved by this acid test.
Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then probable, then certain. To be a possible theory, it must be reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must be reconcilable with all the facts. Every true theory passes through these three stages,--possibility, probability, and certainty.
All the arguments against evolution in general are valid against the evolution of man. There are many other arguments, that prove the evolution of man impossible, even if the evolution of plants and animals can be proved possible.
Even if every argument in this book were invalid, save one, that one valid argument would overthrow evolution, since every true theory must be reconcilable with all the facts (Note how Father is reacting to the authenticity of his own facts. Guilty conscience – Added by The Winster). One irreconcilable fact is sufficient to overthrow evolution.
The evolution of man is not only a guess, but a very wild one; and it is totally unsupported by any convincing (!) arguments. It can be mathematically demonstrated to be an impossible theory.
Page:
All I can say bout this subject which is beyond my comprehension is this: If man evolved from monkeys or apes or whatever - why do we still have monkeys and apes or whatever? :)
hahahahahhahaha....
so we would all be freaks if the Adam and Eve thing was true!
sweet tooth wrote:
> just a thought but if Adam and Eve were the first people here and had
> kids and they had kids wouldnt that be inbreeding?
Yes ofcourse, that was a very vulgar thought that came to my mind.
> just a thought but if Adam and Eve were the first people here and had
> kids and they had kids wouldnt that be inbreeding?
Yes ofcourse, that was a very vulgar thought that came to my mind.
just a thought but if Adam and Eve were the first people here and had kids and they had kids wouldnt that be inbreeding?
ShortyUK "Slice N Dice baby" wrote: -
> What has religion done for us in the last
> one hundred years (or ever)?...
> IT HAS DONE NOTHING BUT INSTIGATE VIOLENCE AND WAR.
> Most people with two brain cells can see that, and why.
> When two beliefs (religions) clash, violence usually results.
> What has science done for us in the last one hundred years?
> Well apart from providing the weapons to accomdate the violence,
> which is done out of fear of death and for the
> protection of the users (which has failed miserably),
> science has saved lifes, openned up new horizons with space,
> solved many riddles of the past, brought us luxuries we could
> only have dreamt of 100 years ago...the list is endless
It seems that you have too much of dislike towards religion, Ain't it? Its true that religion has only induced hatred when it comes to contributions on a mass scale (and not the inividual level). But just like Science is said to be both a curse and a boon, religion is also the same thing. I have always defended science by saying that, Science, by itself, can never do anything bad. It depends only on the way we use it. Whatever science does is for some good. Whatever destructive things are used by us, have been derived from some other benevolent scientific theory.
Apply the same logic to religion, and you'll see that the truth is clear. Remember that communal riots are somewhat more in the hands of religious leaders an politicians; that is what I have observed in the communal riots of Gujarat in 2002.
Anyways, have your say on evolution, especially on Father Williams' arguements
> What has religion done for us in the last
> one hundred years (or ever)?...
> IT HAS DONE NOTHING BUT INSTIGATE VIOLENCE AND WAR.
> Most people with two brain cells can see that, and why.
> When two beliefs (religions) clash, violence usually results.
> What has science done for us in the last one hundred years?
> Well apart from providing the weapons to accomdate the violence,
> which is done out of fear of death and for the
> protection of the users (which has failed miserably),
> science has saved lifes, openned up new horizons with space,
> solved many riddles of the past, brought us luxuries we could
> only have dreamt of 100 years ago...the list is endless
It seems that you have too much of dislike towards religion, Ain't it? Its true that religion has only induced hatred when it comes to contributions on a mass scale (and not the inividual level). But just like Science is said to be both a curse and a boon, religion is also the same thing. I have always defended science by saying that, Science, by itself, can never do anything bad. It depends only on the way we use it. Whatever science does is for some good. Whatever destructive things are used by us, have been derived from some other benevolent scientific theory.
Apply the same logic to religion, and you'll see that the truth is clear. Remember that communal riots are somewhat more in the hands of religious leaders an politicians; that is what I have observed in the communal riots of Gujarat in 2002.
Anyways, have your say on evolution, especially on Father Williams' arguements
I am to post next few arguements within the next week.
No.
Now run along.
Now run along.
Err, nobody interested?
Hey, sorry for the same post posted four times. Sorry, but there was a problem with Opera, I Pressed the "Post this message", but the forums page wont load again. So, I stopped the page loading and again pressed the button. Sorry!
Page: