The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What a rubbish title.
Page:
Exactly.
Ridiculous.
Ridiculous.
That's what the adult books are, a different cover to the "adults" don't look silly reading the book.
Whitestripes DX wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the adult version is just a different cover, with a
> more realistic looking picture.
Yeah, at least thats the way it was was flight of the phoenix.
> I'm pretty sure the adult version is just a different cover, with a
> more realistic looking picture.
Yeah, at least thats the way it was was flight of the phoenix.
I'm pretty sure the adult version is just a different cover, with a more realistic looking picture.
No, it's so retarded adults don't become ashamed at reading a childs book.
Hang on......
Hang on......
I imagine that it's just a clever way to trick collectors into buying the same book twice and make J.K. Rowling even more money. The books couldn't possibly that different or else the story wouldn't make any sense.
The "child and adult" thing is absolutely ridiculous.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Although the quite annoyingly blatent "OMg!1 religionz!1
> boohissboo!" did sorta dampen the experience.
It was subtler and more effectively implemented than that, at least in the first two books.
> Although the quite annoyingly blatent "OMg!1 religionz!1
> boohissboo!" did sorta dampen the experience.
It was subtler and more effectively implemented than that, at least in the first two books.
[URL]http://www.play.com/play247.asp?page=promo&r=BOOK&id=871[/URL]
An adult version and a child version?
An adult version and a child version?
I have never read any of the Harry Potter books. I read an extract once but it didn't hold my interest and I also attempted to watch the first film on DVD but I got bored.
Page: