The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I know by submitting this message I am goin to offend a great deal of poeple. However, i must be said that Halo 2 was not worth the wait. I was extremely dissapointed to discover that the game i was playing was still a magnificent game, but not revolutionary. Halo 2 just feels like another brilliant game, not the sequel to the best game ever made. It just isn't as inspiring or as groundbreaking as the first edition and as a result i feel that, had it been released earlier, the dissapointment would have been minimal. But as it stands, the world has waited years for Halo 2, brushing aside all other contenders stating that, 'ah, gud but when Halo 2 comes out'. Well, it's out but there are games with far more varying gameplay, tactics and AI than Halo 2. For instance, Killzone or Ninja Gaiden. Make no mistake, in my opinion Halo 2 is the best first person shooter money can buy, however it is sadly just not the game that I had expected.
Page:
The Hibernator wrote:
> Does anyone else feel like burning The XB Gamer?
Yes. So you get the petrol and I'll get some matches then we can tie him to a stake and burn him, for all of mankind hope he doesn't survie and come back to haunt us once more.
> Does anyone else feel like burning The XB Gamer?
Yes. So you get the petrol and I'll get some matches then we can tie him to a stake and burn him, for all of mankind hope he doesn't survie and come back to haunt us once more.
Uh, you have played Halo 2? Notice how the Warthog does MORE flips when hit?
Halo 2, but they should add the bouncey vehicles back into it, from the first game.
Does anyone else feel like burning The XB Gamer?
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> There is next to nothing you can do that is revolutionary in FPS games
> now. Even Half Life 2 felt samey at times.
No it didn't.
And Halo 2 wasn't just not revolutionary, it was pathetically average as well.
> There is next to nothing you can do that is revolutionary in FPS games
> now. Even Half Life 2 felt samey at times.
No it didn't.
And Halo 2 wasn't just not revolutionary, it was pathetically average as well.
Ahahahaha.
halo 3 is gonna b the best_ out feB 9th. look on the net
The XB Gamer wrote:
> This is a really dum question of course is:
> HALO 2 OFFICIALY - ONLY ON XBOX.
What?
> This is a really dum question of course is:
> HALO 2 OFFICIALY - ONLY ON XBOX.
What?
This is a really dum question of course is:
HALO 2 OFFICIALY - ONLY ON XBOX.
HALO 2 OFFICIALY - ONLY ON XBOX.
Meh, i don't agree with'people', i thought the few levels i've played on Halo 2 haven't got any freedom, you have to walk along a set path (E.g the big spider levl, Metropolis i think - you run over the bridge, find your way through the city and jump on the robot; no choice of where to go)
whereas in Halo 1 you could go where you wanted.
whereas in Halo 1 you could go where you wanted.
Page: