Viewing Thread:
"Is this illegal?"

Someone i met on a chat forums 2 years ago has started talking to me recently. He told me he was moving to LA and suff like that. Then he told me that he also owns a porn site and gave me a link.

The site has 2 parts, nudity and then porn. On the nudity site there are two girls standing naked, i'm not sure how old they are but they must be between 8-12. I mentioned this to him and he says it's not illegal since it's just nudity and not porn. However i'm not so sure, i feel this is worong. The photo just looks like a family photo of two sisters on a beach, standing naked, there is nothing pornographic about it, but since there are so many paedophiles about, this photo can't be right.

Would you be happy for your daughter of this age to have a naked photo put on a nudity/porn website? I'm sure i wouldn't like this.

He also said some guy tried to sue him, and his lawyer said that the photo was fine. What are your opinions on this? Am i over reacting or is this totally innapproperiate?

I'm not going to post the link, but a lot of you have my msn address if you wanted the link that way, to see what i mean.

Lawrence, I think your dead right... Any pics of children under 18 with no clothes on I would consider as Child Porn... Lawyers always bloody lie to suit their circumstance, so I would not trust a lawyer ever.

Light wrote:
> How does one confuse the Daily Mail? Tell them that the immigrant is
> the natural predator of the paedophile.


Paedophile hunting: the new fox hunting. If we ban paedophile hunting, all the immigrants will have to be slaughtered...

Blank wrote:
> Lawrence wrote:
> since there are so many paedophiles about
>
>
> The Daily Mail Strikes Back, in shops now priced just
> £IMMIGRANT.PAEDOPHILE!!!!1


How does one confuse the Daily Mail? Tell them that the immigrant is the natural predator of the paedophile.

Lawrence wrote:
> since there are so many paedophiles about


The Daily Mail Strikes Back, in shops now priced just £IMMIGRANT.PAEDOPHILE!!!!1

At what point does nudism become porn?

No matter, it's probably hosted in Kazakhstan or somewhere like that.

The guy who owns that site is sick!

what wrote:
> It's darling we're talking about here, remember.
> It's unlike that'd dawn on her.

She's so wasted I doubt anything'll dawn on her.
Time to fill her drip back up methinks ... she's starting to string letters together.

Probly been said but its "nudism" therefore its fine.


Sadly.

It's not kiddy porn, and it's legal. It's just "nudism", I believe.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Anywho - legal or not, anyone who puts naked girls on their web
> site's gonna be a little bit dodgy, donchathink?

It's darling we're talking about here, remember.
It's unlike that'd dawn on her.