The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Someone i met on a chat forums 2 years ago has started talking to me recently. He told me he was moving to LA and suff like that. Then he told me that he also owns a porn site and gave me a link.
The site has 2 parts, nudity and then porn. On the nudity site there are two girls standing naked, i'm not sure how old they are but they must be between 8-12. I mentioned this to him and he says it's not illegal since it's just nudity and not porn. However i'm not so sure, i feel this is worong. The photo just looks like a family photo of two sisters on a beach, standing naked, there is nothing pornographic about it, but since there are so many paedophiles about, this photo can't be right.
Would you be happy for your daughter of this age to have a naked photo put on a nudity/porn website? I'm sure i wouldn't like this.
He also said some guy tried to sue him, and his lawyer said that the photo was fine. What are your opinions on this? Am i over reacting or is this totally innapproperiate?
I'm not going to post the link, but a lot of you have my msn address if you wanted the link that way, to see what i mean.
The site has 2 parts, nudity and then porn. On the nudity site there are two girls standing naked, i'm not sure how old they are but they must be between 8-12. I mentioned this to him and he says it's not illegal since it's just nudity and not porn. However i'm not so sure, i feel this is worong. The photo just looks like a family photo of two sisters on a beach, standing naked, there is nothing pornographic about it, but since there are so many paedophiles about, this photo can't be right.
Would you be happy for your daughter of this age to have a naked photo put on a nudity/porn website? I'm sure i wouldn't like this.
He also said some guy tried to sue him, and his lawyer said that the photo was fine. What are your opinions on this? Am i over reacting or is this totally innapproperiate?
I'm not going to post the link, but a lot of you have my msn address if you wanted the link that way, to see what i mean.
Page:
It might have been said before, but if you go to getdotted.com ( [URL]http://getdotted.com/[/URL] ) and type in the website address - you'll probably get his real home address.
You could than send a spoof letter, that looks official - telling him to take the pictures down.
Just food for thought!
You could than send a spoof letter, that looks official - telling him to take the pictures down.
Just food for thought!
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Mr Flibble wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
>
> Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or
> that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want
> clarification.
>
> Both, I'd think.
> And his pants haven't been changed either.
And his parents still take the pictures.
> Mr Flibble wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
>
> Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or
> that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want
> clarification.
>
> Both, I'd think.
> And his pants haven't been changed either.
And his parents still take the pictures.
just. ......I......
ROFL
ROFL
Mr Flibble wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
>
> Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or
> that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want
> clarification.
Both, I'd think.
And his pants haven't been changed either.
> Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
>
> Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or
> that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want
> clarification.
Both, I'd think.
And his pants haven't been changed either.
Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want clarification.
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Do you mean that you still pull your pants down in the garden, or that not a lot has changed "down there"? I just want clarification.
Goatboy wrote:
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Best laugh I've had so far today. :D
> There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
> Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
>
> Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Best laugh I've had so far today. :D
Dear God, my parents sold a pic of me at age 1 wearing precisely nothing and trying to herd some cows.
Admittedly it was a bestseller among the 70+ age group, but hey...
Admittedly it was a bestseller among the 70+ age group, but hey...
There are endless pics of me sitting in a sink/tub in the garden.
Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Some shots I'm gleefully pulling my pants down.
Actually...not a lot's changed to be honest.
Heck, my parents must be shot then, paedophiles.
I laugh, as it's the same attitude that cries out with anger at when people have to ask permission to take photos of kids.....
I laugh, as it's the same attitude that cries out with anger at when people have to ask permission to take photos of kids.....
The Confederate wrote:
> Lawrence, I think your dead right... Any pics of children under 18
> with no clothes on I would consider as Child Porn... Lawyers always
> bloody lie to suit their circumstance, so I would not trust a lawyer
> ever.
So by that rule, my parents with their piccy of me and my brother at two both naked in a paddling pool, that they love to show the relavives, are in fact filthyChildPornPeddlingPeados.
And no, we're not doing anything else apart from sitting in the pool before some SR smartarse posts "but what were you doing with your brother? Nudge-nudge wink wink". Sometimes it's just too predictable.
> Lawrence, I think your dead right... Any pics of children under 18
> with no clothes on I would consider as Child Porn... Lawyers always
> bloody lie to suit their circumstance, so I would not trust a lawyer
> ever.
So by that rule, my parents with their piccy of me and my brother at two both naked in a paddling pool, that they love to show the relavives, are in fact filthyChildPornPeddlingPeados.
And no, we're not doing anything else apart from sitting in the pool before some SR smartarse posts "but what were you doing with your brother? Nudge-nudge wink wink". Sometimes it's just too predictable.
Page: