The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1. Evolution - brilliant track, nice to hear it in full for once.
2. Carlito - not too bad, but I was never a fan of the song anyway. The spitting and "I spit in the face of people..." etc at the start is the best bit, however much that says for it.
3. Theodore Long - quite good this one, but I still can't get over the fact that it sounds as though a bit near the start is sampled from the WrestleMania 16 theme...Also Rodney Mack's theme, btw.
4. Christian - don't even get me started - it's not even his current theme! Bloody awful.
5. John Heidenreich - this one grew on me with some nice rockin' melodies, but the cheesiness of Heyman and Heidenreich shouting "Heidenreich" through it ceases to amaze me.
6. Diva Search - Why is this theme even on here? They could've at least put Walk Idiot Walk on, but no, and therefore this track won't get another listen.
7. Chavo Guerrero - Quite a nice track from the start with "Oooh, Chavo", but again, like CCC's, not something I'm terribly into.
8. Undertaker - I believe this was Taker's "remix" theme from WrestleMania 20, although I might have to check. Not terribly original, but nostalgiac and decent all the same. Good stuff.
9. Eugene - surprisingly, Eugene's new theme actually made the cut, and it's growing on me like a bad habit. Nothing terribly original, but it's worth a listen all the same.
10. Victoria - the most irritating theme on the CD, bar none. It sounds as though in the mixing studio, the record got stuck, because the phrase "my bad self" is used about 16 bajillion times.
11. Shelton - decent theme here, although it just sounds a little too "rappy" for my liking. The beats and tunes are nice, just a shame about Shelton's singing :0D
12. Kidman - really good theme, my 3rd favourite on the entire disc, and even though it's quite "rappy" again, it's still quite good, and one I've wanted on a CD for a while now.
13. Smackdown - the new Smackdown theme made the cut! It's OK, but I associate with the horrible intro that Smackdown has at the moment. I believe it's by Drowning Pool, so I'll let them off.
14. Gail Kim - the second-best track on here. May make me sound like a right fudgepacker, but I actually listen to this one a load. Really good stuff, shame she got the boot so we won't hear it again :0(
15. JBL - Meh, not a theme I've ever liked. Sounds like the intro was stolen from A-Train's theme if you ask me. And the bit after that reminds me of the Soul Calibur 2 victory theme. Not a big fan AT ALL.
16. John Cena - not worth your time, this is pap rap. They could've at least put his proper theme on, and I don't care if it was on Originals or not.
Overall, I was disappointed with it, but the 2nd CD with some sort of video on should be nice when the CD is released!
2. Carlito - not too bad, but I was never a fan of the song anyway. The spitting and "I spit in the face of people..." etc at the start is the best bit, however much that says for it.
3. Theodore Long - quite good this one, but I still can't get over the fact that it sounds as though a bit near the start is sampled from the WrestleMania 16 theme...Also Rodney Mack's theme, btw.
4. Christian - don't even get me started - it's not even his current theme! Bloody awful.
5. John Heidenreich - this one grew on me with some nice rockin' melodies, but the cheesiness of Heyman and Heidenreich shouting "Heidenreich" through it ceases to amaze me.
6. Diva Search - Why is this theme even on here? They could've at least put Walk Idiot Walk on, but no, and therefore this track won't get another listen.
7. Chavo Guerrero - Quite a nice track from the start with "Oooh, Chavo", but again, like CCC's, not something I'm terribly into.
8. Undertaker - I believe this was Taker's "remix" theme from WrestleMania 20, although I might have to check. Not terribly original, but nostalgiac and decent all the same. Good stuff.
9. Eugene - surprisingly, Eugene's new theme actually made the cut, and it's growing on me like a bad habit. Nothing terribly original, but it's worth a listen all the same.
10. Victoria - the most irritating theme on the CD, bar none. It sounds as though in the mixing studio, the record got stuck, because the phrase "my bad self" is used about 16 bajillion times.
11. Shelton - decent theme here, although it just sounds a little too "rappy" for my liking. The beats and tunes are nice, just a shame about Shelton's singing :0D
12. Kidman - really good theme, my 3rd favourite on the entire disc, and even though it's quite "rappy" again, it's still quite good, and one I've wanted on a CD for a while now.
13. Smackdown - the new Smackdown theme made the cut! It's OK, but I associate with the horrible intro that Smackdown has at the moment. I believe it's by Drowning Pool, so I'll let them off.
14. Gail Kim - the second-best track on here. May make me sound like a right fudgepacker, but I actually listen to this one a load. Really good stuff, shame she got the boot so we won't hear it again :0(
15. JBL - Meh, not a theme I've ever liked. Sounds like the intro was stolen from A-Train's theme if you ask me. And the bit after that reminds me of the Soul Calibur 2 victory theme. Not a big fan AT ALL.
16. John Cena - not worth your time, this is pap rap. They could've at least put his proper theme on, and I don't care if it was on Originals or not.
Overall, I was disappointed with it, but the 2nd CD with some sort of video on should be nice when the CD is released!
Page:
Jae wrote:
> Hmmm... Arguements? It's been a while since I've seen one of these on
> the forum. Partly due to me not being online for a month, but
> still... :)
Yeah, that's what we need, a good argument. Erm, let me think...
Heidenreich is the best wrestler in the WWE!
*sarcasm machine explodes*
Quiet you!
> Hmmm... Arguements? It's been a while since I've seen one of these on
> the forum. Partly due to me not being online for a month, but
> still... :)
Yeah, that's what we need, a good argument. Erm, let me think...
Heidenreich is the best wrestler in the WWE!
*sarcasm machine explodes*
Quiet you!
DW wrote:
> Cong_Man wrote:
> Now, now boys.
>
> Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together,
> wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no
> supper.
>
> Meanie. >:c|
>
> I pick option 2! Yarr.
It wasn't an option.
> Cong_Man wrote:
> Now, now boys.
>
> Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together,
> wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no
> supper.
>
> Meanie. >:c|
>
> I pick option 2! Yarr.
It wasn't an option.
Hmmm... Arguements? It's been a while since I've seen one of these on the forum. Partly due to me not being online for a month, but still... :)
I'm guessing by the looks of things that it's gonna carry on.
*Waits*
I'm guessing by the looks of things that it's gonna carry on.
*Waits*
DW wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances
> of winning GAD more difficult...
>
> Okay...then you're making it more difficult for me to view these
> boards without viewing topics which are against Special Reserve's
> Terms of Service.
But the fact is this - I know you don't care about it, you're just being awkward.
>
> Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act
> on staffies?
>
> Christ...ladies, do not have sex with this man. I guess those who
> love scat would call sticking your nose up someone elses ass a sexual
> act...but I certainly wouldn't.
Well, it is. Sorry.
>
> It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut
> the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
>
> Funk sounds even worse. That makes you sound retarded.
Not really. "STFU!1111 OMG!11111" is far worse.
>
> Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
>
> *nods*
>
> Oh, and you clearly do care about my opinion, since you have taken
> the time out of your seemingly busy schedule (of finding copied
> reviews).
>
> Lastly...how do you know the reviews are copied? Oh, that's right,
> you found them on the website in which you used to copy reviews.
> Hurrah.
You spak. Sod off and stop berating me for no discernable reason.
> Reefer wrote:
> Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances
> of winning GAD more difficult...
>
> Okay...then you're making it more difficult for me to view these
> boards without viewing topics which are against Special Reserve's
> Terms of Service.
But the fact is this - I know you don't care about it, you're just being awkward.
>
> Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act
> on staffies?
>
> Christ...ladies, do not have sex with this man. I guess those who
> love scat would call sticking your nose up someone elses ass a sexual
> act...but I certainly wouldn't.
Well, it is. Sorry.
>
> It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut
> the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
>
> Funk sounds even worse. That makes you sound retarded.
Not really. "STFU!1111 OMG!11111" is far worse.
>
> Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
>
> *nods*
>
> Oh, and you clearly do care about my opinion, since you have taken
> the time out of your seemingly busy schedule (of finding copied
> reviews).
>
> Lastly...how do you know the reviews are copied? Oh, that's right,
> you found them on the website in which you used to copy reviews.
> Hurrah.
You spak. Sod off and stop berating me for no discernable reason.
Cong_Man wrote:
> Now, now boys.
>
> Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together,
> wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no supper.
Meanie. >:c|
I pick option 2! Yarr.
> Now, now boys.
>
> Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together,
> wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no supper.
Meanie. >:c|
I pick option 2! Yarr.
Reefer wrote:
> Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances
> of winning GAD more difficult...
Okay...then you're making it more difficult for me to view these boards without viewing topics which are against Special Reserve's Terms of Service.
> Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act
> on staffies?
Christ...ladies, do not have sex with this man. I guess those who love scat would call sticking your nose up someone elses ass a sexual act...but I certainly wouldn't.
> It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut
> the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
Funk sounds even worse. That makes you sound retarded.
> Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
*nods*
Oh, and you clearly do care about my opinion, since you have taken the time out of your seemingly busy schedule (of finding copied reviews).
Lastly...how do you know the reviews are copied? Oh, that's right, you found them on the website in which you used to copy reviews. Hurrah.
> Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances
> of winning GAD more difficult...
Okay...then you're making it more difficult for me to view these boards without viewing topics which are against Special Reserve's Terms of Service.
> Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act
> on staffies?
Christ...ladies, do not have sex with this man. I guess those who love scat would call sticking your nose up someone elses ass a sexual act...but I certainly wouldn't.
> It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut
> the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
Funk sounds even worse. That makes you sound retarded.
> Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
*nods*
Oh, and you clearly do care about my opinion, since you have taken the time out of your seemingly busy schedule (of finding copied reviews).
Lastly...how do you know the reviews are copied? Oh, that's right, you found them on the website in which you used to copy reviews. Hurrah.
DW wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me,
> I'll refute it.
>
> What? I never accussed you of anything. Jumping to conclusions?
>
> That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I
> did download it, what concern is it of yours?
Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances of winning GAD more difficult...
>
> Just making my point. Even if people do copy reviews...what concern
> is it of yours?
>
> No need to be malicious.
>
> Malicious? So why did you call me an oaf, further down your post?
Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act on staffies?
>
> I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so
> no, it does not work both ways.
>
> You told me to type like a man, instead of abbreviating. Maybe I
> don't want to get banned/warned for swearing?
It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
>
> Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but
> informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have
> to
> wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional
> oaf.
>
> The point of your post is clear...don't take me for a fool, son.
Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
> Reefer wrote:
> No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me,
> I'll refute it.
>
> What? I never accussed you of anything. Jumping to conclusions?
>
> That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I
> did download it, what concern is it of yours?
Because they're making everyone who wrote a proper review's chances of winning GAD more difficult...
>
> Just making my point. Even if people do copy reviews...what concern
> is it of yours?
>
> No need to be malicious.
>
> Malicious? So why did you call me an oaf, further down your post?
Ah, but what's that in regards to suggesting performing a sexual act on staffies?
>
> I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so
> no, it does not work both ways.
>
> You told me to type like a man, instead of abbreviating. Maybe I
> don't want to get banned/warned for swearing?
It just makes you sound retarded. "STFU". Say "Shut the funk up" or something, just not that stupid abbrieviation.
>
> Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but
> informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have
> to
> wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional
> oaf.
>
> The point of your post is clear...don't take me for a fool, son.
Yes, well, I'm glad we understand each other then...
Now, now boys.
Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together, wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no supper.
Please play nice or I will have to bang both your heads together, wash your mouths out with soap and/or send you to bed with no supper.
Reefer wrote:
> No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me,
> I'll refute it.
What? I never accussed you of anything. Jumping to conclusions?
> That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I
> did download it, what concern is it of yours?
Just making my point. Even if people do copy reviews...what concern is it of yours?
> No need to be malicious.
Malicious? So why did you call me an oaf, further down your post?
> I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so
> no, it does not work both ways.
You told me to type like a man, instead of abbreviating. Maybe I don't want to get banned/warned for swearing?
> Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but
> informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have to
> wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional
> oaf.
The point of your post is clear...don't take me for a fool, son.
> No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me,
> I'll refute it.
What? I never accussed you of anything. Jumping to conclusions?
> That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I
> did download it, what concern is it of yours?
Just making my point. Even if people do copy reviews...what concern is it of yours?
> No need to be malicious.
Malicious? So why did you call me an oaf, further down your post?
> I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so
> no, it does not work both ways.
You told me to type like a man, instead of abbreviating. Maybe I don't want to get banned/warned for swearing?
> Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but
> informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have to
> wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional
> oaf.
The point of your post is clear...don't take me for a fool, son.
DW wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> "OMG!11 STFU!11111". Write it like a man, boy-o. And not
> once have I said that I obtained the CD illegally. Never heard of an
> advanced copy import? And finally, I report copied reviews because
> they're clogging up the reviews section, and hindering others from
> winning...
>
> I really don't care for your opinion, and this argument is doing
> nothing but - i) clogging this forum with pure cack, and ii)
> diverging from the point of my original post. If you don't like it,
> naff off.
>
> Write like a man? Hah! Just like you (yes...you... *rollseyes*) wrote
> them reviews that won you so many Gameaday's...
No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me, I'll refute it.
>
> You know as well as I do that you downloaded it. Advanced copy import
> my ass. Also, the advanced copy would come with the second disk
> (DVD)...so yeah.
That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I did download it, what concern is it of yours?
>
> You report reviews as you like to get your tongue up the staffies
> asses (why is a r s e filtered?).
No need to be malicious.
>
> I don't like it...so I'll 'naff off' (write it like a man, boy-o). I
> don't like you, so why don't you 'naff off'? Works both ways.
I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so no, it does not work both ways.
>
> The point of the original post was a "haha I've got it and you
> haven't".
Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have to wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional oaf.
> Reefer wrote:
> "OMG!11 STFU!11111". Write it like a man, boy-o. And not
> once have I said that I obtained the CD illegally. Never heard of an
> advanced copy import? And finally, I report copied reviews because
> they're clogging up the reviews section, and hindering others from
> winning...
>
> I really don't care for your opinion, and this argument is doing
> nothing but - i) clogging this forum with pure cack, and ii)
> diverging from the point of my original post. If you don't like it,
> naff off.
>
> Write like a man? Hah! Just like you (yes...you... *rollseyes*) wrote
> them reviews that won you so many Gameaday's...
No idea what you're talking about. As many times as you accuse me, I'll refute it.
>
> You know as well as I do that you downloaded it. Advanced copy import
> my ass. Also, the advanced copy would come with the second disk
> (DVD)...so yeah.
That may be your belief, but that doesn't make it so. And even if I did download it, what concern is it of yours?
>
> You report reviews as you like to get your tongue up the staffies
> asses (why is a r s e filtered?).
No need to be malicious.
>
> I don't like it...so I'll 'naff off' (write it like a man, boy-o). I
> don't like you, so why don't you 'naff off'? Works both ways.
I don't want to get banned/warned, so I won't even try to swear, so no, it does not work both ways.
>
> The point of the original post was a "haha I've got it and you
> haven't".
Nope, you can clearly see by my post that it was really nothing but informative. I didn't once say "I got it, and you'll all have to wait" etc, or even use a ":0D" smiley. Dellusional oaf.
Page: