The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
ITV1, now.
Watch it.
Watch it.
Page:
J-42 wrote:
> Azul Five-O wrote:
> No, I downloaded it.
> Yes, you're correct. It blatantly is obvious that you downloaded the
> film.
NO SH*T SHERLOCK!
> Azul Five-O wrote:
> No, I downloaded it.
> Yes, you're correct. It blatantly is obvious that you downloaded the
> film.
NO SH*T SHERLOCK!
cookie monster wrote:
> J-42 wrote:
> Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
>
> Perhaps the fact that you didnt seem to pick up on the fact that
> capitalisation can be used for EMPHASIS.
>
> Perhaps.
PERHAPS I WAS MOCKING HIM?
> J-42 wrote:
> Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
>
> Perhaps the fact that you didnt seem to pick up on the fact that
> capitalisation can be used for EMPHASIS.
>
> Perhaps.
PERHAPS I WAS MOCKING HIM?
J-42 wrote:
> Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
Perhaps the fact that you didnt seem to pick up on the fact that capitalisation can be used for EMPHASIS.
Perhaps.
> Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
Perhaps the fact that you didnt seem to pick up on the fact that capitalisation can be used for EMPHASIS.
Perhaps.
Azul Five-O wrote:
> No, I downloaded it.
>
> And why would I watch a film that I've seen numerous times before?
Because it's a fantastic film.
> No, really?
> Jesus Christ.
Blasphomy.
>You, quite frankly, are an absolute idiot.
Yes, you're correct. It blatantly is obvious that you downloaded the film.
> No, I downloaded it.
>
> And why would I watch a film that I've seen numerous times before?
Because it's a fantastic film.
> No, really?
> Jesus Christ.
Blasphomy.
>You, quite frankly, are an absolute idiot.
Yes, you're correct. It blatantly is obvious that you downloaded the film.
No, I downloaded it.
And why would I watch a film that I've seen numerous times before?
No, really?
Jesus Christ. You, quite frankly, are an absolute idiot.
And why would I watch a film that I've seen numerous times before?
No, really?
Jesus Christ. You, quite frankly, are an absolute idiot.
Azul Five-O wrote:
> ...
>
> Which channel? Are you HONESTLY that RETARDED?
>
> And if I were you, I'd pay more attention in English, so that you get
> to understand techniques in the language, you know.
And if I were YOU, I'd hang myself.
> ...
>
> Which channel? Are you HONESTLY that RETARDED?
>
> And if I were you, I'd pay more attention in English, so that you get
> to understand techniques in the language, you know.
And if I were YOU, I'd hang myself.
Oh the ironing. You walked straight into that one.
So you had it on DVD or video.
You could have watched Nightmare before Christmas aswell as Team America.
Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
So you had it on DVD or video.
You could have watched Nightmare before Christmas aswell as Team America.
Pay more attention in English? What exactly are you refering to?
...
Which channel? Are you HONESTLY that RETARDED?
And if I were you, I'd pay more attention in English, so that you get to understand techniques in the language, you know.
Which channel? Are you HONESTLY that RETARDED?
And if I were you, I'd pay more attention in English, so that you get to understand techniques in the language, you know.
Azul Five-O wrote:
> No.
>
> But here's logic for you, spastic.
Now petty insults like that will get you no where.
>
> It was released 11 years ago. Therefore, just maybe, I've seen if
> before. Which in fact, I have. Which I said. I've seen it numerous
> times.
Well if you've seen it 40 times then you must worship it. So it suprises me that you won't watch it again and instead, watch some american film. Or possibly you're just so impatient you can't wait until January.
> Now take that, and compare it with a film that won't arrive in the UK
> until January. A film that, already, is receiving amazing comments
> from critics in the US.
>
> HMMM, TOUGH ONE!
No need to use capitals, my eyesight is in good form.
Out of interest, which channel was "team America" on?
> No.
>
> But here's logic for you, spastic.
Now petty insults like that will get you no where.
>
> It was released 11 years ago. Therefore, just maybe, I've seen if
> before. Which in fact, I have. Which I said. I've seen it numerous
> times.
Well if you've seen it 40 times then you must worship it. So it suprises me that you won't watch it again and instead, watch some american film. Or possibly you're just so impatient you can't wait until January.
> Now take that, and compare it with a film that won't arrive in the UK
> until January. A film that, already, is receiving amazing comments
> from critics in the US.
>
> HMMM, TOUGH ONE!
No need to use capitals, my eyesight is in good form.
Out of interest, which channel was "team America" on?
No.
But here's logic for you, spastic.
It was released 11 years ago. Therefore, just maybe, I've seen if before. Which in fact, I have. Which I said. I've seen it numerous times.
Now take that, and compare it with a film that won't arrive in the UK until January. A film that, already, is receiving amazing comments from critics in the US.
HMMM, TOUGH ONE!
But here's logic for you, spastic.
It was released 11 years ago. Therefore, just maybe, I've seen if before. Which in fact, I have. Which I said. I've seen it numerous times.
Now take that, and compare it with a film that won't arrive in the UK until January. A film that, already, is receiving amazing comments from critics in the US.
HMMM, TOUGH ONE!
Page: