The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
www.platformgamers.net
Page:
gamesfreak wrote:
> The new one is pretty good, however, I reccomend making sure it meets
> web standards, which I'm currently doing to my site right now (still
> got a lot of updating to do yet...), so it meets the demands XHTML
> 1.0 Transistional
It's not exactly the greatest of priorities at the moment. As long as it looks good and works in all browsers you're fine for the time being.
Nobody likes to learn to swim in the deep end.
I'm trying to remake my site so it will have more features and stuff, I've added everything to the database now and I've made a little script to display them depending on their file type too.
[URL]http://phi11ip.com/filepage.php?id=1[/URL]
And the new design I'm working on is here: [URL]http://phi11ip.com/test[/URL]
There's still quite a few things that need sorting but it's coming along nicely, plus it looks a million times better than the last one.
> The new one is pretty good, however, I reccomend making sure it meets
> web standards, which I'm currently doing to my site right now (still
> got a lot of updating to do yet...), so it meets the demands XHTML
> 1.0 Transistional
It's not exactly the greatest of priorities at the moment. As long as it looks good and works in all browsers you're fine for the time being.
Nobody likes to learn to swim in the deep end.
I'm trying to remake my site so it will have more features and stuff, I've added everything to the database now and I've made a little script to display them depending on their file type too.
[URL]http://phi11ip.com/filepage.php?id=1[/URL]
And the new design I'm working on is here: [URL]http://phi11ip.com/test[/URL]
There's still quite a few things that need sorting but it's coming along nicely, plus it looks a million times better than the last one.
I didn't see the old layout
The new one is pretty good, however, I reccomend making sure it meets web standards, which I'm currently doing to my site right now (still got a lot of updating to do yet...), so it meets the demands XHTML 1.0 Transistional
The new one is pretty good, however, I reccomend making sure it meets web standards, which I'm currently doing to my site right now (still got a lot of updating to do yet...), so it meets the demands XHTML 1.0 Transistional
Meh, didn't expect an agreement really.
However, a nice little game-related icon would look cool.
However, a nice little game-related icon would look cool.
Coin wrote:
> But wouldn't you agree that there are much better ways of doing it
> than that, Tyla?
The accessible way of generating navigation like this would be in the form of a styled list. In this case, I see nothing wrong with the ".:" as it is part of the chosen design, but the way it has been excecuted is wrong.
The ".:" should be a bullet image as part of the list-style-type css declaration replacing the usual circle, square etc etc. The rest of the navigation can be generated using CSS styling of the LI or UL which would leave the code being reduced to;
etc etc.
FWIW, in this case, I'd probably use a contectual icon for each menu option.
> But wouldn't you agree that there are much better ways of doing it
> than that, Tyla?
The accessible way of generating navigation like this would be in the form of a styled list. In this case, I see nothing wrong with the ".:" as it is part of the chosen design, but the way it has been excecuted is wrong.
The ".:" should be a bullet image as part of the list-style-type css declaration replacing the usual circle, square etc etc. The rest of the navigation can be generated using CSS styling of the LI or UL which would leave the code being reduced to;
- link 1
- link 2
- link 3
- link 4
etc etc.
FWIW, in this case, I'd probably use a contectual icon for each menu option.
But wouldn't you agree that there are much better ways of doing it than that, Tyla?
Reynolds wrote:
> Got a completely new layout now.
Comapred to this morning, that's a 100x better.
The nav though should be in list format and just assign a custom li image of the ".:" using CSS.
> Got a completely new layout now.
Comapred to this morning, that's a 100x better.
The nav though should be in list format and just assign a custom li image of the ".:" using CSS.
Reynolds wrote:
> Coin wrote:
> Absolutely hate ".:" before links. It's almost as bad as
> "&!" just us a
>
> It's a good job it's not your site then, so you don't need to worry
> about it.
Sorry for giving you some advice...
Meh, it's a general web "turn-off" having stupid n00b things.
Good thing it's a Geocities site then.
Oh wait, it isn't.
All Geocity sites have a rule; use a gimmicky thing before weblinks.
> Coin wrote:
> Absolutely hate ".:" before links. It's almost as bad as
> "&!" just us a
>
> It's a good job it's not your site then, so you don't need to worry
> about it.
Sorry for giving you some advice...
Meh, it's a general web "turn-off" having stupid n00b things.
Good thing it's a Geocities site then.
Oh wait, it isn't.
All Geocity sites have a rule; use a gimmicky thing before weblinks.
Looks better, contact us, gamecube cheats and xbox cheats are out of line though.
"by Reynolds Designs"
haha
haha
Coin wrote:
> Absolutely hate ".:" before links. It's almost as bad as
> "&!" just us a
It's a good job it's not your site then, so you don't need to worry about it.
> Absolutely hate ".:" before links. It's almost as bad as
> "&!" just us a
It's a good job it's not your site then, so you don't need to worry about it.
Page: