Viewing Thread:
"some other sort of rating system"

Anyone else think there should be more ratings than newbie, regular and notable.(and i know there are Staff and JATs too.) Once stupid newbies reach a certain level they just kind of blend into everyone else. There should be more diferentiation between regulars.

who agrees?

Anyone else think there should be more ratings than newbie, regular and notable.(and i know there are Staff and JATs too.) Once stupid newbies reach a certain level they just kind of blend into everyone else. There should be more diferentiation between regulars.

who agrees?

I agree.

But it would be difficult to implement, and the staffies have SO much work to do...

It would be nice to differentiate everyone a bit more, maybe add a title or two...but the main thing is I can post here.

These yellow cards though, I'm all for those not being around =P

I agree even though I am a newbie.
By this time next week, I will be a regular.(Hopefully).

You be needing another 273 posts m'lud. I took me about 50 days to get to regular, as I couldn't be bothered for a while, and even then only on the Sony forum. Since then I've branched out and the world has been the better for it.

witch-king wrote:
> But it would be difficult to implement, and the staffies have SO much
> work to do...

Ahahaha

There should be a colour you get if you reach a certain words per post average after posting say, 5000 times.

Yeah.

I don't need another rating system, I know who the class regular's are, the great regular's are, and the idiot regular's are.

Usernames are the best form of rating system.

Ashman, can we quickly play our pool game?

I'witch-king wrote:
> You be needing another 273 posts m'lud. I took me about 50 days to get
> to regular, as I couldn't be bothered for a while, and even then only
> on the Sony forum. Since then I've branched out and the world has
> been the better for it.

Bet you didn't have T1 and a free week to spend.