Viewing Thread:
"What the government should do:"

Hydrogen bomb the Sahara desert.

Aha. See?

Did you know they have Submarines that run on nuclear fuel? And Aircraft Carriers.

They have a boiler down in the bowels of the ship, a man works day and night, shovelling nuclear bombs into it at regular intervals.

But you actually combust Hydrogen in a hydrogen fueld combustion engine (funnily enough), so, unlike the Hindenburg, the containment for these engines must be pretty sturdy, or thebuses would be gone already.

munn wrote:
> Did you know we have hydrogen fueled buses now?

Very, very interesting.

The great thing about running vehicles containing hydrogen is that they are 100% safe in a crash. Just ask the passengers of the Hindenburg.

Nah, 1/17th of the size.
Although, that would cause the whole desert to be water - it'd be pointless, so 1 50th of the size would be perfect.
Maybe.

And I don't care about the size of the explosion.

Did you know we have hydrogen fueled buses now?

munn wrote:
> Burn hydrogen = really big explosion = no fallout

You'll notice (when you search for a picture of one on the internet) that Hydrogen Bombs are not very big. This really big explosion you describe, if it were to be caused by burning hydrogen, would require so much of the gas, it would probably be the size of the sahara desert to start off with.

And yes, I should research beforehand

I just realised.

WHY?

Burn hydrogen = really big explosion = no fallout

So whyu make thermonuclear ones that cause biggAr damage.

munn wrote:
> Probably.
>
> Atomic bombs and nuclear bombs (funnily enough) are nuclear, hydrogen
> bombs are not.

I think you ought to perhaps research your arguement before-hand

munn wrote:
> Probably.
>
> Atomic bombs and nuclear bombs (funnily enough) are nuclear, hydrogen
> bombs are not.

Do not be silly, hydrogen bombs rely on nuclear fusion to work.

munn wrote:
> Hydrogen bombs aren't nuclear.
> Fool.

Of course!