The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Am I the only one who thinks it looks crap?
I mean, "World of Tomorrow" - crap title. Surely if it is based in the future, then to the people in the film, the world is that of the present?
As for it being done entirely in blue screen except for the odd bit of acting. That would normally be fine if it didn't look like videogame FMV.
I mean, "World of Tomorrow" - crap title. Surely if it is based in the future, then to the people in the film, the world is that of the present?
As for it being done entirely in blue screen except for the odd bit of acting. That would normally be fine if it didn't look like videogame FMV.
Page:
But most-probably won't be.
It's getting pretty decent reviews from the States.
I'll keep an open mind and see for myself, the trailer doesn't look too bad to me. Kind of a parody of the style old b-movies, it won't be oscar winning stuff but it could be fun.
I'll keep an open mind and see for myself, the trailer doesn't look too bad to me. Kind of a parody of the style old b-movies, it won't be oscar winning stuff but it could be fun.
... looks s**t
And there is nothing attractive about Angelina Jolie!
And there is nothing attractive about Angelina Jolie!
It's like they sellotaped Jude Law's face to the film reel of The Iron Giant.
It looks really pants. It's just completely slapped in CG, and looks really, really awful.
It looks amusing in a Flash Gordon-type way. Although whenever I see Paltrow I just want to beat her down, saying "What's she called, Apple? No. No. No."
I'm with Edgy, it looks crap and has a rubbish name.
It's called "World Of Tomorrow" because it's design is based on all those "World Of Tomorrow" type future shows they used to have in america in the 50's...those ones that showed you flying cadillacs and stuff.
Mystique wrote:
>
> It's because they've made it how people from the 1940s thought the
> future would look.
Which therefore has no relevance to the story and is still a stupid title.
>
> It's because they've made it how people from the 1940s thought the
> future would look.
Which therefore has no relevance to the story and is still a stupid title.
All I can remember about Bulletprood Monk is the way that everyone spins backwards uncontrollably when they're hit. Strange.
Page: