Viewing Thread:
"I went to the cinema last night"

And if what people say about things going in cycles are true, then right now we are stuck right in the middle of crappy CGI, crappy plots and retarded one liners. There were three trailers at the cinema last night. The first was one showing a fat red dunce jump through walls, complete with horrible CGI. If you've seen the trailer for "Hellboy" which is what this terd of a movie is called, you'll see it invloves Nazi's, hell and people getting killed. And it's a PG. That's like making a porno movie and pixellating out the sex.

The next was the expressionless and rubbish actor Vin Diesel in the Chronicles of Riddick. What kind of moron would go see this chump, especially when it is a fecking 12A. If he's involved in an "inter planetary war" like the plot says then why is this film a 12A? We'd like to see some blood and full frontal nudity (of women) once in a bloody while.

And third was what could have been a good film, Alien Versus Predator. But it wasn't and you don't even need to watch the film to realize that, it was clearly evident in the trailer. More crappy effects then with a big fact 12A.

So in conclusion cinema - at the moment - is utter crap.

P.S, the adverts are bolocks as well, I had to endure that bloody Harp advert again. You know, the "I fancy a pint of harp" and then the monngoloid that puts it on the Mexican wave. THAT CANT HAPPEN YOU NIMROD!

Yeah AVP, two giant killers.


12A



**** off.

cipro wrote:
> What exactly can you expect from a movie called "Hallboy"?


Perversity.

monkey_man wrote:
> At our cinema they showed the advert for drink-driving, where the
> woman hits the table in the pub

That is the funniest advert ever "Don't drink and sit behind tables", a pity these advertisers can't seem to make a serious advert without turning into a farce.

I've got Hellboy, and for all intents and purposes, found it quite an enjoyable dose of Superhero silliness. What exactly can you expect from a movie called "Hallboy"? It's not meant to be the next Citizen Kane, and I enjoyed it for what it is.

gerrid wrote:
> yeah but just because a film isn't full of gore and breasts doesn't
> mean it isn't any good.

whilst true, in some films it can!

The rating you saw was for the TRAILERS, not the films themselves.

Pointless, I know, since if you're in a 15 rated film, no-one under 15 would/should be in there anyway, so saying "this advert is suitable for all" makes no sense whatsoever, but that's the world we live in.

monkey_man wrote:
> At our cinema they showed the advert for drink-driving, where the
> woman hits the table in the pub, then a couple of adverts later was
> one for Jack Daniels. I didn't know what to do.

Jack Daniels wants you to drink responsibly. Lots and lots responsibly.

yeah but just because a film isn't full of gore and breasts doesn't mean it isn't any good.

it can make a difference in fairness, imagine seven if it had been a twelve or something like that it just wouldn't have worked. they would have had to have cut most of the best stuff

oh dear oh dear. And since when did the certification of a film dictate how good it was? What kind of stupid system is that?

Tiltawhirl wrote:
> The trailer was probably rated 12A.
>
> Chronicles of Riddick looks pretty good if you ask me. Sure it'll be
> mindless but then it was never gonna be Shakespear and it never
> wanted to be.

HAHAHA the ironing!

Watch it, it is a dodgy reworking of Julius Caesar!