The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Watching the Man U vs. Blackburn match and had to laugh when the fourth official put up the minutes added on and the Blackburn fans were unhappy and this guy was tapping his watch looking at the fourth official then his kid copied him but he looked stupid and what made him look more stupid was that he had to watch on so he was tapping his wrist. T'was funny.
Well I s'pose you had to be there to see it. :|
Discuss. :D
Well I s'pose you had to be there to see it. :|
Discuss. :D
Page:
hehe yea maybe one of these years Arsenal will go through a season without a red card..............nah that's a little too crazy :-D
lalakersrule wrote:
> Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including
> Chelsea and us in 99% of cases
>
> That's what you said, so if we get 99% of the decisions, that must
> mean we get everything given to us against you, which is wrong.
Thats why I said 99 not 100. Every now and again, miracles do happen.
:D
> Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including
> Chelsea and us in 99% of cases
>
> That's what you said, so if we get 99% of the decisions, that must
> mean we get everything given to us against you, which is wrong.
Thats why I said 99 not 100. Every now and again, miracles do happen.
:D
Clazon wrote:
> Not directly. But he was clearly influenced by whatever Fergie said.
Well then i expect the ref to be fired from his post in the next few days for favouring one team. However i very much doubt that will be happening
> We were talking about decisions where the ref was influenced by the
> idea of who would experience the effects. My claim was that these 2
> decisions were genuinely wrong, not considered by the ref as the best
> option for the big guys.
>
> The 99% is in your favor against all clubs. Not just us.
Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including Chelsea and us in 99% of cases
That's what you said, so if we get 99% of the decisions, that must mean we get everything given to us against you, which is wrong.
> Not directly. But he was clearly influenced by whatever Fergie said.
Well then i expect the ref to be fired from his post in the next few days for favouring one team. However i very much doubt that will be happening
> We were talking about decisions where the ref was influenced by the
> idea of who would experience the effects. My claim was that these 2
> decisions were genuinely wrong, not considered by the ref as the best
> option for the big guys.
>
> The 99% is in your favor against all clubs. Not just us.
Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including Chelsea and us in 99% of cases
That's what you said, so if we get 99% of the decisions, that must mean we get everything given to us against you, which is wrong.
lalakersrule wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref
> was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready
> that
> day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that
> offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
>
> And the time wasn't changed just because Fergie said so, do you
> really think an official would change time just because a manager
> said so?
Not directly. But he was clearly influenced by whatever Fergie said.
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
>
> My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were
> genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of
> the biggies" brain waves.
>
> So where do you get the 99% of decisions get given to us while
> playing against you then?
We were talking about decisions where the ref was influenced by the idea of who would experience the effects. My claim was that these 2 decisions were genuinely wrong, not considered by the ref as the best option for the big guys.
The 99% is in your favor against all clubs. Not just us.
> Clazon wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref
> was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready
> that
> day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that
> offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
>
> And the time wasn't changed just because Fergie said so, do you
> really think an official would change time just because a manager
> said so?
Not directly. But he was clearly influenced by whatever Fergie said.
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
>
> My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were
> genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of
> the biggies" brain waves.
>
> So where do you get the 99% of decisions get given to us while
> playing against you then?
We were talking about decisions where the ref was influenced by the idea of who would experience the effects. My claim was that these 2 decisions were genuinely wrong, not considered by the ref as the best option for the big guys.
The 99% is in your favor against all clubs. Not just us.
Clazon wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref
> was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready that
> day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that
> offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
And the time wasn't changed just because Fergie said so, do you really think an official would change time just because a manager said so? If so the way Fridel was playing yesterday if i was Fergie i'd have told the ref to add on a good 30 minutes. Watch the game, there was enough stoppages to warrant a 4 minute added on, actually more than that. But hey Elvis is still alive and swimming with aliens
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
>
> My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were
> genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of
> the biggies" brain waves.
So where do you get the 99% of decisions get given to us while playing against you then?
> lalakersrule wrote:
> But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref
> was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready that
> day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that
> offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
And the time wasn't changed just because Fergie said so, do you really think an official would change time just because a manager said so? If so the way Fridel was playing yesterday if i was Fergie i'd have told the ref to add on a good 30 minutes. Watch the game, there was enough stoppages to warrant a 4 minute added on, actually more than that. But hey Elvis is still alive and swimming with aliens
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
>
> My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were
> genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of
> the biggies" brain waves.
So where do you get the 99% of decisions get given to us while playing against you then?
lalakersrule wrote:
> Well how can you complain about United getting decisions when just the
> same day as the Sign-gate scandal Lauren was a very lucky boy to
> still be on the pitch. You get decisions given to you as well, but
> hey let's just pretend it's only a United thing.
But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready that day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of the biggies" brain waves.
> Well how can you complain about United getting decisions when just the
> same day as the Sign-gate scandal Lauren was a very lucky boy to
> still be on the pitch. You get decisions given to you as well, but
> hey let's just pretend it's only a United thing.
But I don't think the Lauren thing was given to us. I think the ref was generally unwilling to produce a red, as was shown all ready that day by another ref. The ref had continued to do so previous to that offence, to penalise Hoyte and give a pen.
> and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
My point exactly. However I believe both of these decisions were genuine by the officials. Not influenced by a "affecting one of the biggies" brain waves.
Well how can you complain about United getting decisions when just the same day as the Sign-gate scandal Lauren was a very lucky boy to still be on the pitch. You get decisions given to you as well, but hey let's just pretend it's only a United thing.
and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
and the Henry offside rubs out the Sol red card
lalakersrule wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Henry's blatant offside goal a season or so back against United.
>
> By your logic Arsenal is a bigger club than United, then.
>
>
> errr, no. If you read my post in the context it was written i was
> pointing out that we don't ALWAYS get the decisions as much as
> everyone else would like to think so.
My point was that you said that the big clubs get the decisions. Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including Chelsea and us in 99% of cases. It wasn't so long ago that Sol got a straight red, whilst playing against you, for doing nothing more than any other player does.
> (speaking of which do you think
> a Norwich lad would have stayed on the pitch if he did to an Arsenal
> player what Lauren did to Huckerby? i doubt it)
I can't deny that he should have been off. I can argue that the referee made the wrong decision instead of chosing the wrong decision. After all, we've seen red cards lost in the ref's deep pockets before. Look at Sorensen earlier that afternoon.
> Clazon wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Henry's blatant offside goal a season or so back against United.
>
> By your logic Arsenal is a bigger club than United, then.
>
>
> errr, no. If you read my post in the context it was written i was
> pointing out that we don't ALWAYS get the decisions as much as
> everyone else would like to think so.
My point was that you said that the big clubs get the decisions. Invariably Man U get them over any other opponent. Including Chelsea and us in 99% of cases. It wasn't so long ago that Sol got a straight red, whilst playing against you, for doing nothing more than any other player does.
> (speaking of which do you think
> a Norwich lad would have stayed on the pitch if he did to an Arsenal
> player what Lauren did to Huckerby? i doubt it)
I can't deny that he should have been off. I can argue that the referee made the wrong decision instead of chosing the wrong decision. After all, we've seen red cards lost in the ref's deep pockets before. Look at Sorensen earlier that afternoon.
lalakersrule wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
>
> I'm happy with very few people moaning about us, and us still taking
> the Premierships, personally.
>
> ;-P
> PremiershipS?? When was the last time you won the Premiership twice
> in a row?
I made no implication that we had won them back to back.
However we have won more than one.
> Clazon wrote:
>
> I'm happy with very few people moaning about us, and us still taking
> the Premierships, personally.
>
> ;-P
> PremiershipS?? When was the last time you won the Premiership twice
> in a row?
I made no implication that we had won them back to back.
However we have won more than one.
Not saying it was a penalty (though why Lorenzo was trying to win the ball by having his hands up almost to ronny's face i don't know) but if it wasn't a penalty then where was Ronny's card for diving? In those situations it's either a penalty or a yellow for the attacker, neither was given.
Page: