The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Have I spelt Supremacy right?
Anyway, saw this earlier today, special preview thanks to Empire magazine. Not bad, but I always thought that the idea of a movie plot was for it to last until the end, rather than for the whole conspiracy to come out with a good 20 minutes to spare, therefore taking a little of the impact out of the ending?
I'm not saying nothing happens in the last 20 minutes - it does, but the way the ealry part of the movie sets it up, you would expect it to all work out at the end...?
Anyway, if you saw the first one, it's more of the same. Not exactly my cup of tea, but watchable, more than watchable, pretty good - if that's your thing.
Anyway, saw this earlier today, special preview thanks to Empire magazine. Not bad, but I always thought that the idea of a movie plot was for it to last until the end, rather than for the whole conspiracy to come out with a good 20 minutes to spare, therefore taking a little of the impact out of the ending?
I'm not saying nothing happens in the last 20 minutes - it does, but the way the ealry part of the movie sets it up, you would expect it to all work out at the end...?
Anyway, if you saw the first one, it's more of the same. Not exactly my cup of tea, but watchable, more than watchable, pretty good - if that's your thing.
Page:
Just come back from seeing it now, and i thought it was a very good sequal, and i dont care about it not being true to the books, it was still a very good film......
I love the trilogy of books, but the first film was just too different from the book. I suppose, for me, it's like Asimov fans are feeling about I,Robot.
They cut the main villian from Identity - Carlos. They was no "Cain is for Carlos" riddle tactics, no Medusa. It just annoyed me.
And Bourne should be older than Matt Damon. He's a Sean Bean type.
They cut the main villian from Identity - Carlos. They was no "Cain is for Carlos" riddle tactics, no Medusa. It just annoyed me.
And Bourne should be older than Matt Damon. He's a Sean Bean type.
I did enjoy the first one - it had Clive Owen in it, so that helped.
Meka Dragon wrote:
> Have I spelt Supremacy right?
Yes. But you spelt "early" wrong.
:^P
Meka Dragon wrote:
> Have I spelt Supremacy right?
Yes. But you spelt "early" wrong.
:^P
Cyclone wrote:
> Worst name for a film ever.
--
There was this book first, y'see...
> Worst name for a film ever.
--
There was this book first, y'see...
I loved the first one, maybe a little too much. But this is on my 'to view' list, along with Spider-Man2 and a couple others...
Worst name for a film ever.
Have I spelt Supremacy right?
Anyway, saw this earlier today, special preview thanks to Empire magazine. Not bad, but I always thought that the idea of a movie plot was for it to last until the end, rather than for the whole conspiracy to come out with a good 20 minutes to spare, therefore taking a little of the impact out of the ending?
I'm not saying nothing happens in the last 20 minutes - it does, but the way the ealry part of the movie sets it up, you would expect it to all work out at the end...?
Anyway, if you saw the first one, it's more of the same. Not exactly my cup of tea, but watchable, more than watchable, pretty good - if that's your thing.
Anyway, saw this earlier today, special preview thanks to Empire magazine. Not bad, but I always thought that the idea of a movie plot was for it to last until the end, rather than for the whole conspiracy to come out with a good 20 minutes to spare, therefore taking a little of the impact out of the ending?
I'm not saying nothing happens in the last 20 minutes - it does, but the way the ealry part of the movie sets it up, you would expect it to all work out at the end...?
Anyway, if you saw the first one, it's more of the same. Not exactly my cup of tea, but watchable, more than watchable, pretty good - if that's your thing.
Page: