The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It had the Blade 2 Bloodpack-style bunch of 'interestingly different' fighter types who use 'interestingly different' weapons and have quirky differences that are supposed to be interesting. But they are, in fact, as crap as the rest of this film. Ray Winstone should be doing better stuff, as should old Stellan.
Still, it's always comedy to see the Hornblower guy.
For that, it must be genius.
10 minutes into the film, I knew it was goin to be bad. I found myself switching off every now and then, cos nothing great happens, ok the fighting scenes are ok, but Clive (king Arthur) is just so boring as the lead actor, he has a dull monotone voice, and u couldnt care less about him. I was surprised by Keira Knightlys performance, she delivered, but did seem a bit out of place at times. The other "knights of the round table" were pretty crap too, the only name I remember one being called is Lancelot. Also there are some really cheesy scenes, with ridiculous arrow shots and a stupid flying bird. My mates were also stunned at how bad it was. I would have left the cinema to get a burger king, but my mates wanted to finish watching it.
> I saw it today and I thought it was a good.
you've just convince me to watch it..
I'm going to ignore you though and see it anyway, as that will give me something to do.
> and Stellan
> Skarsgard wandering about still looking moody because Will Hunting
> was better than him at equations and stuff.
;-p
It had the Blade 2 Bloodpack-style bunch of 'interestingly different' fighter types who use 'interestingly different' weapons and have quirky differences that are supposed to be interesting. But they are, in fact, as crap as the rest of this film. Ray Winstone should be doing better stuff, as should old Stellan.
Still, it's always comedy to see the Hornblower guy.