The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Our pathetic list of English owned car companies just got a tad shorter. In my opinion the finest British Cars being currently made are now officially owned by some millionaire Russian banker.
What happened to English Pride?
Pathetic.
What happened to English Pride?
Pathetic.
Page:
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> To Light;
>
> Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Heh. Nothing to add after it's been pointed out that the first deviation from the topic was by you? Nah, didn't think so. Come back to me when you've got an original idea, 'kay fatpants? Amusing thought your attempts to pretend that you haven't been owned on your very first attempt to be scathing are, I tend to prefer at least a vague challenge from those who seek to use a webboard purely for the purposes of boosting their own withered ego.
>
> Russian cars in GT? suppose it would be good for a laugh and with the
> upgrades etc I suppose they might be okay for the lower classes and a
> few driving schools, but I can't see why anyone would choose them.
Fun? That is, after all, the idea of games...
> To Light;
>
> Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Heh. Nothing to add after it's been pointed out that the first deviation from the topic was by you? Nah, didn't think so. Come back to me when you've got an original idea, 'kay fatpants? Amusing thought your attempts to pretend that you haven't been owned on your very first attempt to be scathing are, I tend to prefer at least a vague challenge from those who seek to use a webboard purely for the purposes of boosting their own withered ego.
>
> Russian cars in GT? suppose it would be good for a laugh and with the
> upgrades etc I suppose they might be okay for the lower classes and a
> few driving schools, but I can't see why anyone would choose them.
Fun? That is, after all, the idea of games...
To Light;
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Russian cars in GT? suppose it would be good for a laugh and with the upgrades etc I suppose they might be okay for the lower classes and a few driving schools, but I can't see why anyone would choose them.
GT already has more than enough cars anyway, I usually start off with the Mazda MX-5 (Japanese?? Not really too up on cars). In red of course, they go faster :P
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Russian cars in GT? suppose it would be good for a laugh and with the upgrades etc I suppose they might be okay for the lower classes and a few driving schools, but I can't see why anyone would choose them.
GT already has more than enough cars anyway, I usually start off with the Mazda MX-5 (Japanese?? Not really too up on cars). In red of course, they go faster :P
Darwock wrote:
> Is Gran Turismo 4 going to feature a Russian cars selection now then?
Heh. If anyone can win in the Lada or the Trabanti then fair play to them!
> Is Gran Turismo 4 going to feature a Russian cars selection now then?
Heh. If anyone can win in the Lada or the Trabanti then fair play to them!
Is Gran Turismo 4 going to feature a Russian cars selection now then?
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Heh; cos of course, your saying;
>Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the >office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour' personality >behind last time and you took it home?
has everything to do with the topic, doesn't it?
Look Bell, we all know how this plays out; you return after licking your previous wounds, and try to pretend that you didn't make an utter fool of yourself last time. You grow increasingly screeching and arrogant, then more and more evasive and offensive. You whinge and whine that people aren't "staying on topic", whilst you yourself consider it your divine right to hurl rather poor insults. Finally, after having been taken apart comprehensively in every single debate you've ran away from, you stomp off and say you'll never return. Then a few weeks or months later, you return.
I'm more than happy to play out the same game; as I repeatedly say, I'm sadistic enough to enjoy a battle of wits with an unarmed man. But I hoped you'd maybe learned something from the apocalyptic humiliation you suffered last time. Apparently not.
> Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling
> instead of, say, the topic.
Heh; cos of course, your saying;
>Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the >office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour' personality >behind last time and you took it home?
has everything to do with the topic, doesn't it?
Look Bell, we all know how this plays out; you return after licking your previous wounds, and try to pretend that you didn't make an utter fool of yourself last time. You grow increasingly screeching and arrogant, then more and more evasive and offensive. You whinge and whine that people aren't "staying on topic", whilst you yourself consider it your divine right to hurl rather poor insults. Finally, after having been taken apart comprehensively in every single debate you've ran away from, you stomp off and say you'll never return. Then a few weeks or months later, you return.
I'm more than happy to play out the same game; as I repeatedly say, I'm sadistic enough to enjoy a battle of wits with an unarmed man. But I hoped you'd maybe learned something from the apocalyptic humiliation you suffered last time. Apparently not.
Lol you don't change do you? Still obsessed with petty squabbling instead of, say, the topic.
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the
> office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour'
> personality behind last time and you took it home?
Meheh. So you're still being as graceful as ever when challenged on an incorrect assumption? I guess some things never change, eh Bell? Your lack of grace, your self-importance, your weak sense of humour, your grotesque obesity...
> Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the
> office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour'
> personality behind last time and you took it home?
Meheh. So you're still being as graceful as ever when challenged on an incorrect assumption? I guess some things never change, eh Bell? Your lack of grace, your self-importance, your weak sense of humour, your grotesque obesity...
TVR is called this because Trevor Wilkinson, the founder bloke, couldn't think of a name - so he took the first, (near) middle and last letters of his first name.
Damn right.
Damn right.
Light wrote:
> Heh. It's always amusing to read a political zealot of one side
> blaming the other for "the decline in our great nation". I
> have news for you; our 'great nation' stopped being great when the US
> slapped us down during the attempt to retake the Suez in 1957. And as
> for industry being sold off...well, I may be wrong, but didn't the
> tories spend most of the 80's selling off our heavy industry?
> Although it doesn't take a genius to see that Labour are merely
> continuing that policy, it requires breathtaking stupidity to try and
> assign all the blame to the actions of one political party over the
> last 7 years.
Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour' personality behind last time and you took it home?
> Heh. It's always amusing to read a political zealot of one side
> blaming the other for "the decline in our great nation". I
> have news for you; our 'great nation' stopped being great when the US
> slapped us down during the attempt to retake the Suez in 1957. And as
> for industry being sold off...well, I may be wrong, but didn't the
> tories spend most of the 80's selling off our heavy industry?
> Although it doesn't take a genius to see that Labour are merely
> continuing that policy, it requires breathtaking stupidity to try and
> assign all the blame to the actions of one political party over the
> last 7 years.
Woohoo Someone left their 'warped sense of humour' module at the office....! What happened? Did I leave my 'lack of humour' personality behind last time and you took it home?
Heh. It's always amusing to read a political zealot of one side blaming the other for "the decline in our great nation". I have news for you; our 'great nation' stopped being great when the US slapped us down during the attempt to retake the Suez in 1957. And as for industry being sold off...well, I may be wrong, but didn't the tories spend most of the 80's selling off our heavy industry? Although it doesn't take a genius to see that Labour are merely continuing that policy, it requires breathtaking stupidity to try and assign all the blame to the actions of one political party over the last 7 years.
Page: