The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://wfigs.proboards5.com/index.cgi?board=wvg&action=display&num=1090272106[/URL]
> Dennis Rodman was the basketball player.
>
That's him! Couldn't for the life of me remember the guys name!
Also Karl Malone popped up once to be DDP's tag partner i believe in a WCW PPV ............. no wonder they're out of business now
> Umm, OK, not sure how to respond to that. But yes, he is in the same
> group now as Drew Carey.
Will sort you out later!
EDIT: Now we've had lunch now you know what i mean..
> So you say he's like Drew Carey.. he entered the Royal Rumble 2002..
> However he did eliminate himself when he was up against Kane!
Umm, OK, not sure how to respond to that. But yes, he is in the same group now as Drew Carey.
> Ahem! Cong you know I'm a HUGE rocky mark..so seeing that will make
> me reply. I Totally love the guy. However the WWE has HAD to survive
> without the Rock. Kinda like when the WWE was without Stone Cold..
> Knowing you Cong you will have other opinions
Well, quite frankly I never rated the Rock in the ring, which is always the most important aspect of wrestling IMHO, I could accept he was a good entertainer, however. But seeing how easily he turned his back on the fans who got his name to where it is in the first place, I no longer consider him any more of a wrestler than the likes of Mr.T, David Arquette, Steve McMichael, that basketballer who always changes his hair colour or any other 'celebrity' who has made brief appearances in the ring. Therefore, I don't consider him worthy of any adulation whatsoever as a wrestler.
> Contrary to popular belief, The Rock is NOT the be all and end all of
> the WWE. They've survived quite well without him and the ratings
> don't go up when they announce he is going to be on a show, so I
> guess his drawing power was over-estimated....
Ahem! Cong you know I'm a HUGE rocky mark..so seeing that will make me reply. I Totally love the guy. However the WWE has HAD to survive without the Rock. Kinda like when the WWE was without Stone Cold.. Knowing you Cong you will have other opinions
> Hhhm, very small roster indeed. If they don't have The Rock in it then
> the game sucks :P
Contrary to popular belief, The Rock is NOT the be all and end all of the WWE. They've survived quite well without him and the ratings don't go up when they announce he is going to be on a show, so I guess his drawing power was over-estimated...
> Hmmm, in the screenshot, its this years Taker, not old school Taker,
> so I expect he'll be in the Smackdown roster as well as a legend
> probably.
>
> And surely Rocky shall be added to the comfirmation list.
I think The Rock will probably be a hidden character, due to his current 'once-in-a-blue-moon' schedule...