Viewing Thread:
"Farenheit 911."

Saw this last night.

Go and watch it. If you can find a cinema near you that's showing it, that is.

Bring Clinton back :-D

Don't know whether i'm going to see it, from what i heard from my leftie mates who went to see it it's just more 'I hate Bush' material. Highlights including focusing on Bush after he hears of the twin towers falling then just sits there for ages and more of how the war in Iraq is false and unjust.

So that's Bush is a rubbish leader and the Iraq war was waged under false pretences ....... wow thanks Moore maybe you can hop into a time machine and go back a year or so when this might have actually been something new to learn.


Even my friends who hate Bush with a passion said they found it tedious and boring and has put me off going to see it. If i'm totally bored out my mind one day i'll go and see it though. Until then come on Battle Royale 2

Mr Snuggly wrote:
>
> It's sad that a fat dude wearing a baseball cap is doing more to get
> Bush out of the White House than the opposing presedential candidate.

--

Ah, give Kerry and Edwards a chance. Kerry can say how he took approximately 10 tons of bullets in 'Nam, and Edwards can just say repeat 'my son is dead' whenever anyone asks him about real politics.

Still, more chance than Wesley Clark would've had.

You get to see interview clips and news clips that you would never normally see.

"Saddam is evil. He has WMD. He tortures his people. And he tried to kill my dad."

'nuff said.

Anialater wrote:
> You should see it, it should be called Falseinheight 911! Almost none
> of the material is true, he just took clips from the news, altered
> them a bit then put them togethor, he had some parts that were acted
> out, but 90% of it isn't true.


This is one of the most entertaining posts ever.

monkey_man wrote:
He's not a talented documentary-maker, and he's definitely not a film-maker.

I'm not a talented documentary-maker or film-makers, but I never won the Palme D'or and an Oscar. Surely the idea of a documentary in the first place is to get people talking and discussing the important matters at hand? In which case, Moore succeeds with flying colours. He can be a little clumsy at times, and I've no doubt that there are a few facts that have been 'leaned' on but his intentions are righteous and should be applauded.

It's sad that a fat dude wearing a baseball cap is doing more to get Bush out of the White House than the opposing presedential candidate.

Goatboy wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> I'll probably check this out eventually. It'll have explosions.
> ----
>
> ???????????
> I wouldn't expect something quite so tasteless from an intelligent
> person?

Well, it was meant to be a joke, albeit quite a poor one.

I do think that Moore uses clips that are in the publice domain - but don't normally get seen because of their graphic nature - to wow people into thinking he has done some extraordinary pieces of research and daring. He's not a talented documentary-maker, and he's definitely not a film-maker. I just think he got lucky in a time when celebrity status can so easily be achieved, which kept him on the platform he needed, and the morale of the country is low enough to celebrate a book of anti-American institute feelings. He's not the first American to put together this sort of work, just got the right time and audience.

I did hear that it was alright, but merely crude propaganda to wow the uninformed. Also that it's an awful piece of film making. Wasn't expecting a whole lot else really.

Still, I want to seek out and watch Bowling for Columbine.

prefer Bowling For Columbine

You can't trust a political radio show, but you can trust a political documentary?

Oh, so what the radio says must be true.

I'll remember that next time Moyle's tells us to burn our genitals off.