The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You think you can tell me what to wear?
YOU BETTER GET READY TO BOW TO THE MASTERS
YOU BETTER GET READY TO BOW TO THE MASTERS
Page:
mattributé wrote:
> Just face it, man, you've been totally pwnd by an 1337 ha>
Well, on general you just got pwnd by a woman. Go figure.
> Just face it, man, you've been totally pwnd by an 1337 ha>
Well, on general you just got pwnd by a woman. Go figure.
Just face it, man, you've been totally pwnd by an 1337 ha>
Fun for all the family.
Memorandum wrote:
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name
>
> Yes, you did, in fact. You quoted my post, and replied to it
> specifically:
No. I quoted your post and made a point based around it. If I was replying directly to you, I would have used your name.
>
> Memorandum wrote:
> Since when did having a gold name make you any better than anyone
> else, Mr High-And-Mighty-Look-At-Me?
>
> The Masked Man wrote:
> "Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you
> don't like, rather than doing the right thing and keeping your
> mouth shut, give you the right to criticise anyone?"
>
> I've highlighted the key words to make it easier for you to
> understand.
YOU and YOUR used in the same sense as a rhetorical question. That is, applying to any and everyone whom it applies to.
>
> I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to
> retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
>
> That's okay then, now we know that you were actually referring to
> people, but that you use the word "something" to refer to a
> large number of people. I suppose you didn't backtrack then, you
> just don't seem to understand how to use simple words.
and you my good man don't seem to understand the ambiguities of the English language. Also I did NOT use 'smoething' to refer to people, rather to an unspecific subject, inferring wrestling, but also applying to anything else. For example I wouldn't go in to a flower arranging forum and abuse flower arranging, even though I don't enjoy it, I just wouldn't go there.
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name
>
> Yes, you did, in fact. You quoted my post, and replied to it
> specifically:
No. I quoted your post and made a point based around it. If I was replying directly to you, I would have used your name.
>
> Memorandum wrote:
> Since when did having a gold name make you any better than anyone
> else, Mr High-And-Mighty-Look-At-Me?
>
> The Masked Man wrote:
> "Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you
> don't like, rather than doing the right thing and keeping your
> mouth shut, give you the right to criticise anyone?"
>
> I've highlighted the key words to make it easier for you to
> understand.
YOU and YOUR used in the same sense as a rhetorical question. That is, applying to any and everyone whom it applies to.
>
> I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to
> retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
>
> That's okay then, now we know that you were actually referring to
> people, but that you use the word "something" to refer to a
> large number of people. I suppose you didn't backtrack then, you
> just don't seem to understand how to use simple words.
and you my good man don't seem to understand the ambiguities of the English language. Also I did NOT use 'smoething' to refer to people, rather to an unspecific subject, inferring wrestling, but also applying to anything else. For example I wouldn't go in to a flower arranging forum and abuse flower arranging, even though I don't enjoy it, I just wouldn't go there.
The Masked Man wrote:
> Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name
Yes, you did, in fact. You quoted my post, and replied to it specifically:
Memorandum wrote:
> Since when did having a gold name make you any better than anyone
> else, Mr High-And-Mighty-Look-At-Me?
The Masked Man wrote:
"Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like, rather than doing the right thing and keeping your mouth shut, give you the right to criticise anyone?"
I've highlighted the key words to make it easier for you to understand.
> I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to
> retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
That's okay then, now we know that you were actually referring to people, but that you use the word "something" to refer to a large number of people. I suppose you didn't backtrack then, you just don't seem to understand how to use simple words.
> Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name
Yes, you did, in fact. You quoted my post, and replied to it specifically:
Memorandum wrote:
> Since when did having a gold name make you any better than anyone
> else, Mr High-And-Mighty-Look-At-Me?
The Masked Man wrote:
"Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like, rather than doing the right thing and keeping your mouth shut, give you the right to criticise anyone?"
I've highlighted the key words to make it easier for you to understand.
> I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to
> retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
That's okay then, now we know that you were actually referring to people, but that you use the word "something" to refer to a large number of people. I suppose you didn't backtrack then, you just don't seem to understand how to use simple words.
Memorandum wrote:
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Did I say criticise wrestling or criticise people? Go and check
> that.
> Go. Hurry up.
>
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like
>
> "something"
>
> 1) This is a singular word, and wrestling is one "thing".
>
> 2) 'People' is a plural, so you couldn't have been referring to
> people using the word "something".
>
> 3) Last I heard it isn't nice to go around referring to people as
> "things" anyway.
>
> Hard luck, backtrack king.
Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name, or was I referring to people who have posted in this thread in general? Maybe you should question why you bothered to reply to my post if you aren't either a) paranoid or b) so self obsessed that you think people must be talking to you? I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Did I say criticise wrestling or criticise people? Go and check
> that.
> Go. Hurry up.
>
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like
>
> "something"
>
> 1) This is a singular word, and wrestling is one "thing".
>
> 2) 'People' is a plural, so you couldn't have been referring to
> people using the word "something".
>
> 3) Last I heard it isn't nice to go around referring to people as
> "things" anyway.
>
> Hard luck, backtrack king.
Backtrack King? Hardly. Did I mention you by name, or was I referring to people who have posted in this thread in general? Maybe you should question why you bothered to reply to my post if you aren't either a) paranoid or b) so self obsessed that you think people must be talking to you? I think you'll find in order to 'back track' I need to retract something I've said. I haven't I stand by it all.
wonders why everyone cant get along.. *Continues to live in Lucy world*
GO GO SUPER MEMO
The Masked Man wrote:
> Did I say criticise wrestling or criticise people? Go and check that.
> Go. Hurry up.
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like
"something"
1) This is a singular word, and wrestling is one "thing".
2) 'People' is a plural, so you couldn't have been referring to people using the word "something".
3) Last I heard it isn't nice to go around referring to people as "things" anyway.
Hard luck, backtrack king.
> Did I say criticise wrestling or criticise people? Go and check that.
> Go. Hurry up.
> The Masked Man wrote:
> Since when did coming in a forum to abuse something you don't like
"something"
1) This is a singular word, and wrestling is one "thing".
2) 'People' is a plural, so you couldn't have been referring to people using the word "something".
3) Last I heard it isn't nice to go around referring to people as "things" anyway.
Hard luck, backtrack king.
jim-hat wrote:
> Cong_Woman wrote:
> jim-hat wrote:
> YOU THINK I'M CUTE, YOU KNOW I'M SEXY.
>
>
> *looks up and down,* Nah ive seen much better thanks so i'll pass
>
> You have upset me beyond words. Thanks. Thanks alot.
> All I wanted to do was make some nice friends with similar interests
> by posting quotes from established wrestlers (both new skool and
> old), and I find replies filled with MALICE and HATRED, why is this?
>
> What did I do wrong?
> :'(
Jim hat.. I only said it as a joke.. geeez.. *Hands Jim a joke book*
> Cong_Woman wrote:
> jim-hat wrote:
> YOU THINK I'M CUTE, YOU KNOW I'M SEXY.
>
>
> *looks up and down,* Nah ive seen much better thanks so i'll pass
>
> You have upset me beyond words. Thanks. Thanks alot.
> All I wanted to do was make some nice friends with similar interests
> by posting quotes from established wrestlers (both new skool and
> old), and I find replies filled with MALICE and HATRED, why is this?
>
> What did I do wrong?
> :'(
Jim hat.. I only said it as a joke.. geeez.. *Hands Jim a joke book*
Page:
Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars
Check out some of our customer reviews below:
Impressive control panel
I have to say that I'm impressed with the features available having logged on... Loads of info - excellent.
Excellent support service!
I have always found the support staff to provide an excellent service on every occasion I've called.
It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.