The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I saw a very good documentary on this not too long ago, but I won't bother you all with the details, as I'm sure you all have your own theories.
The question I want to pose to you is:
Did that first ship actually land on the Moon or was it staged?
With reason please....and theories, anything!
The question I want to pose to you is:
Did that first ship actually land on the Moon or was it staged?
With reason please....and theories, anything!
Page:
Virtuoso wrote:
> Question:
>
> How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16,
> and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?
Simple, what does one usually use to change ones TV set over? A remote perhaps??? Could not the same thing have been used on the Moon?
> Question:
>
> How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16,
> and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?
Simple, what does one usually use to change ones TV set over? A remote perhaps??? Could not the same thing have been used on the Moon?
=D
Tell that to FF over there.
You never know; squabbles can reach such derogatory levels.
After spending gagillions on getting there in the first place, I doubt leaving a camera behind was the worst of their troubles.
(I got that Question from a website)
But in return to what you said FF, wouldn't that mean the "One whole step for man..." statement had already been exacted?
But in return to what you said FF, wouldn't that mean the "One whole step for man..." statement had already been exacted?
There was MORE than one person on the moon, hence someone could man the camera.
Question:
How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?
How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?
Wasn't there supposed to be a Japanese probe that was gonna circle the moon at low orbit and take mega hi res pictures of the whole surface, this would have picked up the equipment left on the moon and would have conclusively proved beyond all doubt that the landing took place.
Has this happened yet?
If so, where are the pictures?
Has this happened yet?
If so, where are the pictures?
VenomByte wrote:
> The space race was crippling both nations economically, so perhaps
> there's a motive for both to conspire there.
Hmmm maybe but still if they had spent all that money trying to beat the Americans unless the US gave them a huge payoff then i don't see them agreeing to keep quiet. The moon landing was a huge propaganda tool.
Also if it was faked there are too many people who would know about it and it's human nature to be able to keep a secret about as well as David Beckham can keep a penalty from hitting Row Q.
> The space race was crippling both nations economically, so perhaps
> there's a motive for both to conspire there.
Hmmm maybe but still if they had spent all that money trying to beat the Americans unless the US gave them a huge payoff then i don't see them agreeing to keep quiet. The moon landing was a huge propaganda tool.
Also if it was faked there are too many people who would know about it and it's human nature to be able to keep a secret about as well as David Beckham can keep a penalty from hitting Row Q.
Page: