The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The main thing i've picked up from Euro 2004 is just how over-rated and what poor losers England are, however other than that the other thing to have got my attention is the apparent new rule of if you dare touch any part of the opponents body while making an attempt to win the ball you will be penalised for it.
Every single little nudge when players go up for the ball is punished, any time a player makes full contact with the ball with his foot while slide tackling yet catches the player as well gets punished also. Sooner or later football is going to turn into a none-contact sport. How i long for the old days where the likes of Chopper Harris could scythe someone down yet because he made contact with the ball first it was ok and play was allowed to continue. Football is meant to be a game full of passion and tough play, none of this poncy *ooooh you nasty man you gave me a push in the back so i'll react like someone has just shot me 27 times in the stomach* it's time it went back to that.
Yes you could argue football now has a far bigger financial bearing on it and their players should be protected but for god sakes these are meant to be grown men, if they can't handle a bit of rough play then they should go off and play cricket and relax in the pavillion where it's nice and safe. Back on the school playground you couldn't go a breaktime without sometime completely missing the ball and cracking your knee cap round the other side of your leg, however most people got straight back up and raced after the massive crowd chasing the ball, none of this rolling around crying until the physio came on or until the ref calls the foul, which magically heals them. (Maybe the NHS could paint white lines down the hallway, put the patient on a stretcher and then cross over the line. It seems to work wonders for the footballers who after screaming in agony for 2 minutes are suddenly fit and raring to go)
However the thing which puzzles me the most now with this new found protection of the little dears is the fact that defenders can make absolutely no attempt to play the ball and just block off the attacker while ferrying the ball over the line for a goal kick. Now surely if a midfielder gets punished for not playing the ball then why don't the defenders. If you saw Roy Keane standing 2 foot away from the ball and just basically stopping Stevie Gerrard getting the ball then surely you'd be thinking that's a foul so why not if Ashley Cole stands the same distance away blocking Gronkjaer? I've always thought you should make an attempt to play the ball at all times and there's a little rule called obstruction, why if every time there's a slight bit of contact in the rest of the park is there nothing given in this area of the field?
Tis a funny old game we enjoy, just not a very physical one anymore (depending on the area of the pitch anyway)
Every single little nudge when players go up for the ball is punished, any time a player makes full contact with the ball with his foot while slide tackling yet catches the player as well gets punished also. Sooner or later football is going to turn into a none-contact sport. How i long for the old days where the likes of Chopper Harris could scythe someone down yet because he made contact with the ball first it was ok and play was allowed to continue. Football is meant to be a game full of passion and tough play, none of this poncy *ooooh you nasty man you gave me a push in the back so i'll react like someone has just shot me 27 times in the stomach* it's time it went back to that.
Yes you could argue football now has a far bigger financial bearing on it and their players should be protected but for god sakes these are meant to be grown men, if they can't handle a bit of rough play then they should go off and play cricket and relax in the pavillion where it's nice and safe. Back on the school playground you couldn't go a breaktime without sometime completely missing the ball and cracking your knee cap round the other side of your leg, however most people got straight back up and raced after the massive crowd chasing the ball, none of this rolling around crying until the physio came on or until the ref calls the foul, which magically heals them. (Maybe the NHS could paint white lines down the hallway, put the patient on a stretcher and then cross over the line. It seems to work wonders for the footballers who after screaming in agony for 2 minutes are suddenly fit and raring to go)
However the thing which puzzles me the most now with this new found protection of the little dears is the fact that defenders can make absolutely no attempt to play the ball and just block off the attacker while ferrying the ball over the line for a goal kick. Now surely if a midfielder gets punished for not playing the ball then why don't the defenders. If you saw Roy Keane standing 2 foot away from the ball and just basically stopping Stevie Gerrard getting the ball then surely you'd be thinking that's a foul so why not if Ashley Cole stands the same distance away blocking Gronkjaer? I've always thought you should make an attempt to play the ball at all times and there's a little rule called obstruction, why if every time there's a slight bit of contact in the rest of the park is there nothing given in this area of the field?
Tis a funny old game we enjoy, just not a very physical one anymore (depending on the area of the pitch anyway)
Page:
Nice rant, thoroughly deserving of it's urine coloured whitewash!
Anyway enough of the scouse hating we're straying from the main point, which is me bragging about my first ever GAD win after only 703 days......ahem........Yay me :-D
lalakersrule wrote:
> Virtuoso wrote:
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
>
>
> Though what they don't tell you is that the committee were bribed
> with car stereo's, clothes and threatening to send Cilla Black over
> to them to get them to make that decision :-D
:D Wonderful!
> Virtuoso wrote:
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
>
>
> Though what they don't tell you is that the committee were bribed
> with car stereo's, clothes and threatening to send Cilla Black over
> to them to get them to make that decision :-D
:D Wonderful!
Virtuoso wrote:
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
Oh, the irony
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
Oh, the irony
Virtuoso wrote:
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
Though what they don't tell you is that the committee were bribed with car stereo's, clothes and threatening to send Cilla Black over to them to get them to make that decision :-D
> It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
Though what they don't tell you is that the committee were bribed with car stereo's, clothes and threatening to send Cilla Black over to them to get them to make that decision :-D
Virtuoso wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> It's Ben you theiving scouse tink,
> --
> I always assumed it was Paul from the Paulrevere in your MSN name :P
Everyone assumes that. Anyway nope, it's Ben. Paul Revere is a song by my favourite band the Beastie Boys
> oh and i'll have my car stereo back thank you,
> --
> I've already sold it :D
Well with that fiver go get yourself a sesame street book and learn how to read. Although it may be a tad complicated for you at first :-D
> i saw you in full adidas tracksuit legging it from my car last night
> :-D
> --
> I heard that one of the neighbours informed you of my whereabouts.
> Yes, I know where they live!..
So, i don't like them anyway. Also this may be a good time to tell you i don't drive or have a car so you got someone else's by mistake you silly twoker :-D
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> It's Ben you theiving scouse tink,
> --
> I always assumed it was Paul from the Paulrevere in your MSN name :P
Everyone assumes that. Anyway nope, it's Ben. Paul Revere is a song by my favourite band the Beastie Boys
> oh and i'll have my car stereo back thank you,
> --
> I've already sold it :D
Well with that fiver go get yourself a sesame street book and learn how to read. Although it may be a tad complicated for you at first :-D
> i saw you in full adidas tracksuit legging it from my car last night
> :-D
> --
> I heard that one of the neighbours informed you of my whereabouts.
> Yes, I know where they live!..
So, i don't like them anyway. Also this may be a good time to tell you i don't drive or have a car so you got someone else's by mistake you silly twoker :-D
It's actually a nice place Alec, it's a World Heritage site!
lalakersrule wrote:
It's Ben you theiving scouse tink,
--
I always assumed it was Paul from the Paulrevere in your MSN name :P
oh and i'll have my car stereo back thank you,
--
I've already sold it :D
i saw you in full adidas tracksuit legging it from my car last night :-D
--
I heard that one of the neighbours informed you of my whereabouts. Yes, I know where they live!..
It's Ben you theiving scouse tink,
--
I always assumed it was Paul from the Paulrevere in your MSN name :P
oh and i'll have my car stereo back thank you,
--
I've already sold it :D
i saw you in full adidas tracksuit legging it from my car last night :-D
--
I heard that one of the neighbours informed you of my whereabouts. Yes, I know where they live!..
One leads to another, before you know it, you're driving down a road firing your uzi out the window killing dozens of innocent people...oh... that's why i never go to Liverpool.
A stolen car would have been more appropriate I'd have though; we "thieve", not murder ;)
Page: