The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Boyle and Garland not involved.
Waits for torrent of "well, it might be good then", "Oh, they are zombies really", "crap arty farty movie", "I didn't like it at all". Well, I'll tell you what. I don't give a damn. I love the movie. It's a classic British horror movie and a great genre movie in it's own right. Still, would have prefered the ending when Jim died but you can't have everything. You don't like the movie, your loss. Anyway, this sequel is a pure money spinning excercise, and will suck balls.
[URL]http://chud.com/news/june04/june2128.php3[/URL]
Waits for torrent of "well, it might be good then", "Oh, they are zombies really", "crap arty farty movie", "I didn't like it at all". Well, I'll tell you what. I don't give a damn. I love the movie. It's a classic British horror movie and a great genre movie in it's own right. Still, would have prefered the ending when Jim died but you can't have everything. You don't like the movie, your loss. Anyway, this sequel is a pure money spinning excercise, and will suck balls.
[URL]http://chud.com/news/june04/june2128.php3[/URL]
Page:
It was crap. Granted, I've only seen it once, but it definitely wasn't the scary film everyone said it was.
Give me Dog Soldiers any day.
Give me Dog Soldiers any day.
cipro wrote:
> Seeing the full apocalyptic plague of infected tearing through London
> would be awesome,
Yup.
> in fact, why has there never been a zombie movie,
> which shows you the outbreak rather than the aftermath?
That would be the remake "Dawn of the Dead".
Well, a small part of the outbreak anyway. Certainly more than has been attempted before.
> Seeing the full apocalyptic plague of infected tearing through London
> would be awesome,
Yup.
> in fact, why has there never been a zombie movie,
> which shows you the outbreak rather than the aftermath?
That would be the remake "Dawn of the Dead".
Well, a small part of the outbreak anyway. Certainly more than has been attempted before.
What a stupid name, I guess the spin off more sequels with imaginative titles such as 28 months later, or maybe 28 Decades? Personally I think 28 Day Before would have been a much better idea.
Seeing the full apocalyptic plague of infected tearing through London would be awesome, in fact, why has there never been a zombie movie, which shows you the outbreak rather than the aftermath?
Seeing the full apocalyptic plague of infected tearing through London would be awesome, in fact, why has there never been a zombie movie, which shows you the outbreak rather than the aftermath?
Boyle and Garland not involved.
Waits for torrent of "well, it might be good then", "Oh, they are zombies really", "crap arty farty movie", "I didn't like it at all". Well, I'll tell you what. I don't give a damn. I love the movie. It's a classic British horror movie and a great genre movie in it's own right. Still, would have prefered the ending when Jim died but you can't have everything. You don't like the movie, your loss. Anyway, this sequel is a pure money spinning excercise, and will suck balls.
[URL]http://chud.com/news/june04/june2128.php3[/URL]
Waits for torrent of "well, it might be good then", "Oh, they are zombies really", "crap arty farty movie", "I didn't like it at all". Well, I'll tell you what. I don't give a damn. I love the movie. It's a classic British horror movie and a great genre movie in it's own right. Still, would have prefered the ending when Jim died but you can't have everything. You don't like the movie, your loss. Anyway, this sequel is a pure money spinning excercise, and will suck balls.
[URL]http://chud.com/news/june04/june2128.php3[/URL]
Page: