The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Waits for torrent of "well, it might be good then", "Oh, they are zombies really", "crap arty farty movie", "I didn't like it at all". Well, I'll tell you what. I don't give a damn. I love the movie. It's a classic British horror movie and a great genre movie in it's own right. Still, would have prefered the ending when Jim died but you can't have everything. You don't like the movie, your loss. Anyway, this sequel is a pure money spinning excercise, and will suck balls.
[URL]http://chud.com/news/june04/june2128.php3[/URL]
As for the films, I can't see whats going to happen unless theres some stupid goverment coverup about to happen and they send that guy back to die.
> Mental note: don't read about 28 Weeks Later if you haven't
> seen 28 Days Later ...
*Arg* Apologies, didn't think of the spoilers in the article.
> It was crap. Granted, I've only seen it once, but it definitely wasn't
> the scary film everyone said it was.
Wasn't scary, and see original posts comments.
> Give me Dog Soldiers any day.
Good honest fun. But not scary either. "I hope I give you the sh!tes, you f***** wimp. "
> The sequel to Dog Soldiers is also NOT written or directed by the
> original english creators and has instead moved to America.
>
> *shudders*
Strange. Not what I heard. I heard Wurzles son was "the john Mclain" of horrow, and tackes vampires bnext and genetic engineering (Frankenstein's Monster) in the third. All written and directed by the original team.
Probably wrong though..............
*shudders*