The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Special mention must go to Derek Fisher who's game winning shot in game 5 with just 0.4 seconds left on the clock surely won the series for us. Had flashbacks of Horry in game 6 against the Sacramento Queens a couple years back :-D
Probably have the T-Wolves in the final though i would prefer the Queens after we've demolished them this season and also just for the sheer smugness it would bring. But with the 4 headed monster of big diesel, Kobe, the mailman and the glove they can bring anyone on and we'll beat them.
Let the dynasty begin.........again.
Beat the T-Wolves in game 1 97-88, which means we take the home court advantage, which could mean the Lakers just sweep the series but if Garnett gets in gear then we may get in trouble. However if Shaq plays like he did in game 1 then there's nothing to worry about, Big Diesel proving with the double double that he is indeed still the most dominant player in the game
> lakersrule, do you live in the States?
Used to for a few years when i was younger then moved back here. Hoping as soon as i get my teaching degree to leave for Japan or America
> lalakersrule wrote:
> I've been to a good 70 odd games and i'm telling you it's not like
> that, now back to making fun of the Queens when they lose to either
> the T-wolves or get humiliated by the Lakers :-D
>
> i think you're going a little ott on the kings at the moment.
> besides, i reckon the lakers would be in trouble if they faced an in
> form garnett. he's been a machine this year.
Which is why i'd rather face the queens as i've said. Garnett has been the best player this year and i'd rather we avoided him. Of course Garnett is only one player while we have the four headed monster and also Fisher who seems to be stepping up when it comes to crunch time. And the Queens - Lakers rivalry is kind of like the Arsenal - United rivalry only there's far more hate :-D
> also, i think home court means more to lakers than most other teams.
Yup Staples is an absolute cauldron of atmosphere and can either be the Lakers best ally or their worst hinderance. There's no inbetween, we're either cheering them on or letting them know exactly how much they suck
> as for being at a bball game, go and watch the london towers or
> nottigham somebodies, etc. they aren't "quite" as big, but
> they'll give you a good idea.
Just don't expect the quality to be anywhere near on the same level :-D
> I've been to a good 70 odd games and i'm telling you it's not like
> that, now back to making fun of the Queens when they lose to either
> the T-wolves or get humiliated by the Lakers :-D
i think you're going a little ott on the kings at the moment. besides, i reckon the lakers would be in trouble if they faced an in form garnett. he's been a machine this year.
also, i think home court means more to lakers than most other teams.
as for being at a bball game, go and watch the london towers or nottigham somebodies, etc. they aren't "quite" as big, but they'll give you a good idea.
Ah who cares...
I've been to a good 70 odd games and i'm telling you it's not like that, now back to making fun of the Queens when they lose to either the T-wolves or get humiliated by the Lakers :-D
> lalakersrule wrote:
> Colourless wrote:
>
> Never been to an NBA game. Would like to though. Atmosphere
> looks
> good. But they seem to jump up and cheer after every point scored.
> Allow me to add bold to my above quote.....
Allow me to further bold your post. Not been to a game yet you seem to know how people act at one. Strange that but ah well :-P