The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> They have their greedy little paws in many different technological
> product markets e.g. TV's, Walkman's, Stereo's. They don't rely
> solely on gaming like Nintendo do, but that is why Nintendo are
> better at gaming.
Yes they may have fingers in pies, but if it weren't for sony, you wouldn't have many of the items above, as they designed em.
> Nintendo knows best, give me 30 reasons why their better than Nintendo
OK, but you have to remember these are subjective views.
1. I prefer Sony's range of games to Nintendo's.
2. ...
...
No, wait, that was it.
> it doesnt have idiot fanboys posting crap like you!
Well, actually.....
Also, I wasn't actually attempting to use sarcasm at all. I was more or less agreeing with your point. The products I was making reference to were games (naturally), consoles (how long they'll last, punishment they can take, stuff like that) and other peripherals (GC controller is better than PS2's, for example).
And Nintendo don't do much else other than create gaming products. Which was my overall point.
Nintendo make higher quality and more innovative products than Sony do. But they really don't do much else.