The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is going into the darker parts of my mind
As you all know(or should do) i'm a evolutionist, i believe in survival of the fittest but that contradict's my own life, i'll explain.
When i was younger i was diagnosed with a serious medical condition, now without the interception of the doctors and their unnatural drugs i would be dead, and it occurred to me that i am pro-evolution and yet i have damaged it by being alive, if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Is medicine anti-evolution ?
Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Nature Vs Science
As you all know(or should do) i'm a evolutionist, i believe in survival of the fittest but that contradict's my own life, i'll explain.
When i was younger i was diagnosed with a serious medical condition, now without the interception of the doctors and their unnatural drugs i would be dead, and it occurred to me that i am pro-evolution and yet i have damaged it by being alive, if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Is medicine anti-evolution ?
Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Nature Vs Science
Page:
This is going into the darker parts of my mind
As you all know(or should do) i'm a evolutionist, i believe in survival of the fittest but that contradict's my own life, i'll explain.
When i was younger i was diagnosed with a serious medical condition, now without the interception of the doctors and their unnatural drugs i would be dead, and it occurred to me that i am pro-evolution and yet i have damaged it by being alive, if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Is medicine anti-evolution ?
Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Nature Vs Science
As you all know(or should do) i'm a evolutionist, i believe in survival of the fittest but that contradict's my own life, i'll explain.
When i was younger i was diagnosed with a serious medical condition, now without the interception of the doctors and their unnatural drugs i would be dead, and it occurred to me that i am pro-evolution and yet i have damaged it by being alive, if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Is medicine anti-evolution ?
Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Nature Vs Science
*books a hurst*
Flockhart wrote:
> Is medicine anti-evolution ?
> Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Of course it does, just look at the people with downs syndrome and the ilk, what sort of life would they have had a few centuries ago?
> Is medicine anti-evolution ?
> Does it keep alive people that should be dead ?
Of course it does, just look at the people with downs syndrome and the ilk, what sort of life would they have had a few centuries ago?
Fiery Salamander wrote:
> *books a hurst*
Hmmm
> *books a hurst*
Hmmm
My major problem is the thought i should be dead, i think it took something from me, maybe that we have a right to live and i dont feel like that anymore.
Flockhart wrote:
> if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Great quote.
Anyway, science Vs nature.
Humans are natural, we create things. Are they not then also natural?
Mmmmm, natural breasts...
> if i had been born 100 years ago i would be dead.
Great quote.
Anyway, science Vs nature.
Humans are natural, we create things. Are they not then also natural?
Mmmmm, natural breasts...
English_Bloke wrote:
> Humans are natural, we create things. Are they not then also
> natural?
No it is natural to provide and care for those around you, but doing it as a job goes against nature and only happens because of morality, survival of the fittest say's the weak will die and the strong remain, what is the natural benefit of keeping alive the weak.
> Mmmmm, natural breasts...
Oh yes indeed, i love nature..........
> Humans are natural, we create things. Are they not then also
> natural?
No it is natural to provide and care for those around you, but doing it as a job goes against nature and only happens because of morality, survival of the fittest say's the weak will die and the strong remain, what is the natural benefit of keeping alive the weak.
> Mmmmm, natural breasts...
Oh yes indeed, i love nature..........
Correction, buddy - you should have been dead 100 years ago, you should be alive now. And by the miracles of advancement, by golly it seems that you are. Unless you're an AI sentient or some advanced forum bot.
What if the weak of body are strong of mind and therefore self-sufficient?
Maybe we are meant to die whenever we die. And what you preseive as being 'I should of died' is wrong, and your time has not come to die.
Maybe
Maybe
Page: